Yeah i made mention of videoblogging-universe.com earlier in this thread...
and it was the first time I thought about RO for a long while.   I enjoyed
chatting with him back in the day.
At one point, he and meiser and I were formulating a way to use his stuff
through an open service- thats actually why SpreadTheMedia.org was born.
But we just couldnt seem to keep momentum and RO left the scene.

Ok, I am going to email him ;)

Sull

On 2/9/07, Devlon Duthie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   Yeah, I'd give one of my toes (maybe even two...) for Ro's source code.
>
> I haven't posted a vlog in a very long time, but when I did....yup,
> every post had a thumb, just got used to it from the 'old days'. But I
> think now with flash embeds, people forgot that the embed 'visual'
> doesn't carry through to the feed and their feeds have no thumbs.....
>
> If nothing else, the thumbs give someone who isn't already interested in
> watching your clip something that might entice them to watch. I've
> found lots of new feeds to watch just from scanning thumbs....I can get
> a glimpse of what's inside the media...helps with the glut of it all.
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
> Devlon Duthie
> http://devlonduthie.com
>
> Find great independent video:
> http://mefeedia.com
>
> Steve Watkins wrote:
> > Ahar cheers thats where I had seen animated previews in the past but I
> > forgot - Ro's flash thumbs - thanks for the reminder.
> >
> > Could you go into a bit more detail about the sorts of things youve
> > done to ensure your feed looks good? How are you including a thumbnail
> > for each post at the moment?
> >
> > I hope the momentum for improving on RSS can be rebuilt, there seemed
> > to be a burst of activity a few years ago but not much progress since?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Steve Elbows
> >
> > --- In [email protected] <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Devlon Duthie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> This is a good point Steve, Ro and his flash-thumb things were freaking
>
> >> great....haven't seen anything beyond this.
> >>
> >> imho, it is were me, and it used to be :) as a content-creator, I found
>
> >> snapping a thumb of my clip and using it in my post, ad therefore in my
>
> >> feed took far less time than the value I found in making sure that the
> >> feed looked good in the aggregators.
> >>
> >> I'd love to wait and see what crazy new thumb/flash thing that someone
> >> builds, but for the time being it seems so simple and easy to have a
> >> thumb for a clip in a feed. Spending as much time as I do around
> >> aggregators, etc. the ones with thumbs for each clip look more
> >> enticing.....it's all part of packaging really. People spend a ton of
> >> time building out their blogs, video-content, etc.....but (in most
> >> cases) spend very little time on the presentation of thier rss feed.
> >>
> >> Since rss (so far) is a huge part of the ditribution method of this new
>
> >> media I would think it would be very important to have a robust rss
> >>
> > feed
> >
> >> with as much metadata as can be jammed into it.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Devlon Duthie
> >> --
> >> http://devlonduthie.com
> >>
> >> Find great independent video:
> >> http://mefeedia.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Steve Watkins wrote:
> >>
> >>> Are static thumbnails any good for video really anyway?
> >>>
> >>> Are there any examples of, or people working on, something more than
> >>> single frame thumbnails? Ive been pondering whether a better way of
> >>> previewing video exists, I dont know as it does, but Im thinking about
> >>> it anyway.
> >>>
> >>> Im also very excited about future much richer & nicer user interfaces.
> >>> Microsoft stuff like WPF, WPF/E, AJAX/DHTML in general, and Apple
> >>> stuff like Core Animation, are technologies that may help this a bit.
> >>> Will certainly need thumbnails or preview animations of videos to make
> >>> this experience decent, I hadnt realised that thumbnail in RSS stuff
> >>> was still such an issue - big shame, doubt I can be much use helping
> >>> with this, but full support to anybody who can, please :)
> >>>
> >>> Is there any need to provide more than one thumbnail for a post in the
> >>> feed? Different resolutions etc? Is there anything in RSS at the
> >>> moment for attaching artwork or icon to the whole feed (eg show
> >>> branding? Any merit whatsoever for enabling people to sspecify a
> >>> graphic for license info - eg is there any sense whatsoever to having
> >>> people do their creative commons stuff as a seperate video animation
> >>> or still? I was just musing about alternative video aggregators of the
> >>> future and how they could display the license info for each video in s
> >>> small seperate window? OK thats probably a silly idea, I dunno.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>>
> >>> Steve Elbows
> >>>
> >>> --- In [email protected] <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "billshackelford"
> >>> <bshackelford@> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> I agree.. mediaRSS already exists and is supported by many.
> >>>>
> >>>> --- In [email protected]<videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>,
> sull <sulleleven@> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> nah.
> >>>>> encourage mediaRSS spec for thumbnails.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> and consider using blip feeds (blip users).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> sull
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 2/8/07, Mike Meiser <groups-yahoo-com@> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Yeah, maybe we should skip the whole overriding media microfotmat
> >>>>>> thing...
> >>>>>> and in true microformats style solve the simplest and most
> >>>>>>
> > necissary
> >
> >>>>>> problem
> >>>>>> first.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I.E. <img src="" rel=thumbnail>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It's actually hard for me to believe people aren't actually
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>> using this
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>> somewhere in the RSS-o-sphere. Has anyone seen anything.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It perfectly in keeping with other specs like rel=tag,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>> rel=enclosure,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>> rel=payment and a host of others.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It will also work with perfectly with other forms of media feeds
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>> like
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>> audio,
> >>>>>> and photocasts as well. It's a univeral element.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Any objections to this?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -Mike
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2/8/07, duthied2004 <duthied@ <duthied%40gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hey all.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I've been out of the loop on this list for some time and have
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>> tried to
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>> catch up on this, so forgive me if stuff has been said/asked
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>> before....
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>> But, I'd love to hear how people are setting the thumbnails
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>> for their
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>> entries....do you use mediarss on your site, is it only in the
> >>>>>>> 'description' of the post, in a thumbnail element in the item
> >>>>>>> elements? As Mike mentioned it's a hodge-podge currently.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Glad to see the same names on here still, as well as many more
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>> new ones.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>> -Devlon
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --- In [email protected]<videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>> <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>> groups-yahoo-com@ wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> There is also a larger issue Bill which Josh touched on.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The general problem is that while 90% (or some otherwise
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>> very hight
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> percent of vloggers) have thumbnails in their posts they are not
> >>>>>>>> "semantically" specified. This is to say they are not
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>> specified in
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> standard way which can be recognized by aggregators and
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>> search sites
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> like Fireant, vlogdi, mefeedia and others. For example...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>> eclosures
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> can be specified in your blog post among other ways by a
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>> microformat
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> standard "rel=enclosure". There is no standards for huge
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>> amounts of
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> supporting meta infromation like thumbnails, i.e. there is no
> >>>>>>>> "rel=thumnail".
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> We're working on mechanisms not only to better identify
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>> thumbnails in
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> blog posts, among other things, by creating a new media
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>> Microformat.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> It should not only have a tremendous immediate impact for
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>> people who
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> use services like blip, feedburner, mefeedia, fireant and
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>> others, but
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> it should also put this control into YOUR hands if you like when
> >>>>>>>> you're writing a blog post.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> P.S. Josh, I hope you'll collaborate on this media
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>> microformat as well
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> as sharing other ideas on sharing thumbnail information.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Peace,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -Mike
> >>>>>>>> mmeiser.com/blog
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 1/19/07, Peter Van Dijck <petervandijck@> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hey Josh, I haven't checked that feature in like a year,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> so it may
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>> have
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> stopped working.. let Frank know if you have any questions
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> about
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>> that, I'm
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> sure he'd be happy to get it running again.. all my fault!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Peter
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 1/19/07, Joshua Kinberg <jkinberg@> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Bill,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> We're currently working on this issue and plan to have a
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> big new
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>> release of the FireAnt website in February. This new
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> release will
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>> support the Media RSS namespace for thumbnails.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Currently, we can grab thumbnails from blog posts if
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> they are
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>> included
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> in the link to the video enclosure file like this:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> <a href="http://link/to/video.mov"; rel="enclosure"><img
> >>>>>>>>>> src="http://link/to/thumbnail/image.jpg"; /></a>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> We also have the ability to get thumbnail images from
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> MeFeedia,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>> but it
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> seems that MeFeedia may have disabled this feature.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hope that helps explain... please stay tuned for our new
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> website
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>> update that will address this along with many other bug
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> fixes
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>> and new
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> features.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>> Josh
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> http://FireAnt.tv
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 1/19/07, billshackelford
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> <bshackelford@<bshackelford%40gmail.com>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> My videos do not have thumbnails on FireAnt. It seems
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> they do
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>> not
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> utilize the Yahoo Media
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> RSS namespace attributes. Is there a reason why? If
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> there is a
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>> legal
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> reason.. why don't they
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> just come up with their own namespace?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I believe I read something about FireAnt getting
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> thumbnails from
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Mefeedia but my
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> thumbnails show up Mefeedia fine.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone know if there is something I can do to have my
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> thumbnails
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> show up on FireAnt?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Here is my channel on FireAnt:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> billshackelford.com podcast
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://fireant.tv/directory/channel/22981
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> Find 10000s of videoblogs and podcasts at http://mefeedia.com
> >>>>>>>>> my blog: http://poorbuthappy.com/ease/
> >>>>>>>>> my job: http://petervandijck.net
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Sull
> >>>>> http://vlogdir.com (a project)
> >>>>> http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog)
> >>>>> http://interdigitate.com (otherly)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>  
>



-- 
Sull
http://vlogdir.com (a project)
http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog)
http://interdigitate.com (otherly)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to