C'mon Bill, who are you kidding. 1938media has billing above you at Podtech, a private media company and network with sponsors and shows.
You are in there eating with the trolls. --- In [email protected], "Bill Streeter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Loren who? What are you talking about? Is Loren a group troll or > something? What did I miss? Why should we care what this "Loren" > that you speak of thinks, says or does? Is he in charge of > something? What makes him relevant? > > Seriously, are we really gonna talk about every fool with an opinion > that says something stupid in a video? Why should we care? Youtube > is full of nutcases with webcams saying stupid shit. Are we gonna > talk about all of them too? > > Don't feed the trolls. > > Bill Streeter > LO-FI SAINT LOUIS > www.lofistl.com > www.billstreeter.net > > --- In [email protected], "Steve Watkins" <steve@> > wrote: > > > > In his latest video, Loren provides a sort-of-explanation about his > > recent videos, and then launches a scathing attack on this group. > > > > Complains about: > > > > Groupthink > > Nobody emailing him > > Nobody making a video about it or taking other action, all talk > > Not having any balls > > People trying to get podtech to censor him. > > > > > > Now personally I have a trackrecord of talking about groupthink > here, > > and sometimes going against the grain. I therefore share some of > his > > concerns about this stuff, but I am rather unsure of the specifics > of > > what he was trying to prove, Im not sure Ive learnt anything new > so I > > resent his suggestion that he has proved something to the gullible > herd. > > > > He talks of the potential of what social media could really be used > > for, but doesnt go into any detail, so I am left guessing as to > > whether he means the same sorts of things I feel are possible, and > > often complain arent really happening. > > > > Persoanally I freely admit to having no balls, and of being mostly > all > > talk, and rarely making videos, so those complaints dont bother me, > > but are probably unfair to a lot of other people here. > > > > And I think this whole thing was a pretty crappy example of > > groupthink. Not everybody here has expressed the same opinion by a > > long shot, and I think there have been much better examples of > > groupthink in the past. The best examples of groupthink Ive seen > are > > when everyone jumps on a bandwagon and starts attacking something > > without learning the facts first, its happened here to one degree > or > > another in the past. But the thing with Feldmans video was that > > watching the video was about the only fact available. I take his > point > > that maybe some people could of thought to ask him, if they wanted > to > > form their own independent conclusions, but with something like > this > > does someone really need to do anything other than watch the video > to > > form an opinion? > > > > I would guess that not everybody here wants podtech to censor him, > I > > certainly dont, and therefore I dont think its a great example of > > groupthink at all. Especially as numerous people have made lengthy > > posts where they ponder his motives, whether he was using it to > make > > some other point, so how can he claim that everybody fell for it? > Just > > because the group may seem to Feldman to be one large mash of > people > > with a collective stupid brain, doesnt make it so, if he is too > lazy > > to look at the subtle differences in peoples opinions then pah. Its > > the same phenomenon as racism really isnt it, lumping everyone > > together under one label in the mind? > > > > Cheers > > > > Steve Elbows > > >
