Blogger just recently allowed commentors to check a box fo follow comments
via email.

Havent any idea what you guys' are taling about, but...

I love it when the coders get all excited.

:)

Jan

On Jan 31, 2008 7:22 AM, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It's included in wordpress feeds already.  -  but I dont think it is
> in blogger feeds
>
> On Jan 31, 2008 1:12 AM, Mike Meiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Cool.
> >
> > Example of a comment feed reference from sull's blip feed:
> > http://sull.blip.tv/rss
> >
> > <item>
> >   <guid isPermaLink="false">9856168E-BE0C-11DC-A000-B09E966E5011</guid>
> >   <link>http://blip.tv/file/586535</link>
> >   <title>What is it that's driving this?</title>
> >   [...]
> >   <wfw:commentRss>
> http://blip.tv/comments/?attached_to=post592232&amp;skin=rss
> </wfw:commentRss>
> >   <comments>http://blip.tv/file/586535</comments>
> > </item>
> >
> > wfw, as in <wfw:comments>, stands for "well formatted web"
> >
> > spec is as mentioned here:
> http://wellformedweb.org/news/wfw_namespace_elements/
> >
> > <comments> being part of the original RSS 2.0 spec. It appears to be
> > the url to the page where you can make a comment.
> >
> >
> > So... Basically we have the start of a potential working ecosystem.
> > The next question is who else supports this? Wordpress? Blogger?
> > Moveable type? Feedburner?
> >
> > If not already a part of Wordpress could it be implimented with a
> > plugin or added to an existing plugin from SIAB or that which david
> > meade just created?
> >
> > Will have to do more research.
> >
> > -Mike
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jan 31, 2008 12:16 AM, Sull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > and i just checked blip feeds and... good on them ;)
> > > it's in there.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jan 31, 2008 12:10 AM, Sull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > For starters, their should be wide adoption of WFW - Well-Formed Web
> > > > wfw:commentRss namespace element.
> > > >
> > > > http://wellformedweb.org/news/wfw_namespace_elements/
> > > >
> > > >
> http://www.sellsbrothers.com/spout/default.aspx?content=archive.htm#exposingRssComments
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Jan 30, 2008 10:56 PM, Mike Meiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It's not that complex though to track comments.
> > > > >
> > > > >  You follow the permalink.
> > > > >
> > > > >  You parse the page one time... you look for the comment RSS most
> > > > >  platforms have them now. You display all or part of the comments
> in
> > > > >  the aggregator... maybe as trackbacks, you just take them into
> > > > >  account in the aggregator as ranking info, display them with the
> other
> > > > >  comments and on site activity... maybe you simply say "8 more
> comments
> > > > >  at joevlog.com". This last idea in particular is a personal
> favorite
> > > > >  of mine because it simultaneously drives traffic back to the vlog
> > > > >  while adding value to the aggregator.
> > > > >
> > > > >  There in fact may be packages / API's out by now on for tracking
> blog
> > > > >  comments... there are certainly meta standards, at least one
> > > > >  documented micoformat for comments.
> > > > >
> > > > >  There are of course potential partners. I've chatted with the
> guys at
> > > > >  co.mments.com. They're huge potential for them to licensce their
> > > > >  technology. It actually makes much more sense then running a
> single
> > > > >  webservice for them... because obviously mefeedia and other
> > > > >  specialized aggregatory communities don't compete directly or
> even
> > > > >  indirectly.
> > > > >
> > > > >  But... partnership is probably not necessary... because like i
> said...
> > > > >  comments are very widely standardized around blogging packages
> these
> > > > >  days.
> > > > >
> > > > >  Of course.... there's still cooler things... there's tracking...
> > > > >  which posts/ blogs are linking in the content to which posts.
> It's
> > > > >  meme tracking... like techmeme.com and megit.com. Tracking the
> > > > >  conversations in the vlogosphere. All that data is already in
> > > > >  mefeedia's DB... all that need be done is to process it. The
> > > > >  combination of these two types of tracking could light a fire
> under
> > > > >  the vlogosphere.... and of course it's implied that it'd light a
> fire
> > > > >  under the webservice that did such a thing just like it's done
> for
> > > > >  companies like techmeme and dozens of others.
> > > > >
> > > > >  What's more... it's organic unlike digg... and embraces an open
> > > > >  ecosystem unlike youtube.
> > > > >
> > > > >  Peace,
> > > > >
> > > > >  -Mike
> > > > >  mmeiser.com/blog
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >  On Jan 30, 2008 9:44 PM, Frank Sinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >  > We're working on putting technology in place - a new Video
> Search
> > > > >  > Engine - that will hopefully enable the tracking of video
> responses
> > > > >  > across vlogs.
> > > > >  >
> > > > >  > The problem is extremely complex as there are many variations
> on
> > > > >  > formatting, blog post URLs, embedding, etc. It will be
> interesting to
> > > > >  > do some small experiments such as apply the technology to a
> "hot"
> > > > >  > conversation that becomes threaded / moves in many different
> directions.
> > > > >  >
> > > > >  > Regards,
> > > > >  > Frank
> > > > >  >
> > > > >  > http://www.mefeedia.com - Discover the Video Web
> > > > >  >
> > > > >  > --- In [email protected], "Mike Meiser"
> > > > >  > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  >
> > > > >  > > Sweet work David, Jay and everyone who worked on it.
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  > > Now all we need is 3rd party services, i.e. aggregators and
> meme
> > > > >  > > trackers to start tracking video comments as well as simply
> RSS feeds.
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  > > This has long been one of the biggest failings of
> aggregators. it'
> > > > >  > > not just about the RSS... it's about the conversations at the
> end of
> > > > >  > > the permalinks... AND it's about other bloggers and their
> blog posts
> > > > >  > > referencing each other.
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  > > As people such as David, Jay and the Show in the box team
> build more
> > > > >  > > value into the comments hopefully others will stand up and
> take
> > > > >  > > notice.
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  > > Conversation tracking, meme tracking, or social aggregation.
> There are
> > > > >  > > many names and many approaches to exploring what is I
> personally think
> > > > >  > > is a whole new frontier beyond the diggs, facebooks, twitters
> and
> > > > >  > > myspaces into a much more organic and natural social space.
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  > > These aggregators will make 1.0 versions of aggregators look
> one
> > > > >  > > dimensional. And they are.
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  > > Examples of 1.0 aggregators
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  > > - bloglines
> > > > >  > > - google newsreader
> > > > >  > > - various software aggregators: itunes, fireant, miro,
> newsgator,
> > > > >  > > netnewswire, vienna
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  > > Examples of experiments in conversation tracking are
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  > > - co.comments.com
> > > > >  > > - cocomment.com
> > > > >  > > - Megatite
> > > > >  > > - Commentful, commentful.blogflux.com
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  > > And a couple of Meme trackers
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  > > - megite.com
> > > > >  > > - techmeme.com
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  > > There' probably a bunch I don't know about or am forgetting
> about.
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  > > I have yet to see a RSS / blog aggregator that also tracks
> users
> > > > >  > > comments well. But there are a few out there who's names I
> can't
> > > > >  > > remember yet.
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  > > I think the one web-service in this space that is best
> positioned to
> > > > >  > > start tracking video comments and memes across the
> vlogosphere is
> > > > >  > > mefeedia, but sadly though i've pushed and pushed it hasn't
> happened
> > > > >  > > yet. Consider this another suggestion. (Disclaimer: I'm not
> longer a
> > > > >  > > part of mefeedia.)
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  > > -Mike
> > > > >  > > mmeiser.com/blog
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  >
> > > > >  > > On Jan 30, 2008 1:46 PM, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >  > > > for those of you using Wordpress, Davod Meade craeted a
> whole new
> > > > >  > > > plugin for video comments:
> > > > >  > > > http://www.davidmeade.com/wordpress-plugins#videoComments
> > > > >  > > >
> > > > >  > > > It seems works much better than what we were using Semanal:
> > > > >  > > >
> http://semanal.org/2008/01/27/week-5-2008-video-commenting-is-live/
> > > > >  > > >
> > > > >  > > > The plugin adds some extra fields to the comment area.
> > > > >  > > > The video comment then shows up as a clickable thumbnail
> and lays
> > > > >  > > > inline if you also have vPIP installed.
> > > > >  > > >
> > > > >  > > > This is a good example of old fashioned team work.
> > > > >  > > >
> > > > >  > > > Jay
> > > > >  > > >
> > > > >  > > > --
> > > > >  > > > http://jaydedman.com
> > > > >  > > > 917 371 6790
> > > > >  > > > Professional: http://ryanishungry.com
> > > > >  > > > Personal: http://momentshowing.net
> > > > >  > > > Photos: http://flickr.com/photos/jaydedman/
> > > > >  > > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/jaydedman
> > > > >  > > > RSS: http://tinyurl.com/yqgdt9
> > > > >  > > >
> > > > >  > > >
> > > > >  > > >
> > > > >  > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >  > > >
> > > > >  > > >
> > > > >  > > >
> > > > >  > > >
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  >
> > > > >  >
> > > > >  >
> > > > >  >
> > > > >  >
> > > > >  > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >  >
> > > > >  >
> > > > >  >
> > > > >  >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.DavidMeade.com
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


-- 
The Faux Press - better than real
http://feeds.feedburner.com/diaryofafauxjournalist - RSS
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
aim=janofsound
air=862.571.5334
skype=janmclaughlin


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to