Agreed - a community needs to have a standard of practice in order to, well... practice! And CC seems to be the way to go. The hard part is this: videobloggers come in all different varieties. Some are posting thoughts and conversation-starters (sorta like text blogs). Others think of their posts more like an online version of a tv show. And then everything in-between.
How do you get consensus on that? Where do you even start (well, besides discussing it here - that's probably a good start)? Good thinking, either way! david (who has to go teach an intro to facebook class for some library managers now) On Jan 31, 2008 1:28 PM, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Asked a slightly different way - what's the difference? What's the > > difference between someone's text-based words and someone's video-based > > words? I'm thinking you should be able to "pull quotes" from both. > > this would be my instinct as well. > But the newspaper/book industry welcomes others to quote from their > commercial work with attribution, so text bloggers had a positive > model to follow. > > We videobloggers have Hollywood (MPAA) and the music industry (RIAA) > as examples for best practices. > They have spent millions making sure we know that any use of work is > piracy, illegal, walled garden, no. > So of course we seem to view our own video work this way. > > But we dont have to. > I know many of us practice Creative Commons which is awesome. > But I think a community consensus for Fair Use when having > conversations/debate is important. > > Jay > > -- > http://jaydedman.com > 917 371 6790 > Professional: http://ryanishungry.com > Personal: http://momentshowing.net > Photos: http://flickr.com/photos/jaydedman/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/jaydedman > RSS: http://tinyurl.com/yqgdt9 > > -- David King davidleeking.com - blog http://davidleeking.com/etc - videoblog [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
