I agree with David here, but I also wonder how much of Apple's sales are
effected by their commitment to accessibility. For example, how many
government sales or small business sales or educational sales wouldn't
have even been possible if they weren't able to demonstrate that they
had an accessible solution and meet the various regulations and laws, at
least here in the US? I think this would explode the 100K figure by
quite a bit, although I'm not sure it's possible to capture such a
number. I also don't mean to take away from Apple's commitment to
accessibility. I think their commitment goes beyond just bottom line
dollars and cents, although they are a business, and I don't think
they're doing it entirely out of the kindness of their corporate hearts.

On 17/09/12 16:05, Scott Howell wrote:
> David,
> 
> True, but my point is that although a small portion of the overall sales, 
> APple still considers this segment worth the investment. I would love to know 
> what the real numbers are across all Apple products including the Macs. 
> 
> On Sep 17, 2012, at 4:19 PM, David Chittenden <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Do not consider 100,000 iPhones to blind folk to be much of a market in this 
>> case. This number represents 0.3% of 1 quarter year of Apple's iPhone sales, 
>> but includes all models of iPhones for the past 3 years. In other words, if 
>> Apple were to stop supporting VO, they wouldn't even notice the tiny bump to 
>> their profits. Apple is not supporting concepts of universal access for 
>> their bottom line. 
> 

-- 
Christopher (CJ)
chaltain at Gmail

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" Google 
Group.
To search the VIPhone public archive, visit 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.


Reply via email to