Would we not want to wire the reactors in parallel to avoid a voltage drop between the two reactors if they were connected in series?
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Alberto De Souza < alberto.investi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Alain, you are right in your analysis. A skeptic may point out all the > problems you have mentioned. But we have something new now: MFMP and their > live science approach. If they show (live) the complete process of puting > the two reactors in series and the reactor with fuel shows significantly > higher temperature for enough time, it is done. No skeptic whining will be > strong enough to change the tide. All big-funded laboratories in world will > try and replicate the results in the following few days (all relevant data > for replication will be in the Internet). MFMP is doing everything right, > and they are using the weapons of today - immediate socialization of > information. If they are successful in a experiment as I have suggested, > i.e. a live experiment with a clear null hypothesis ( > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_hypothesis), they will make history. > > To my knowledge, no one in history have yet presented an experiment > showing significant excess heat side by side with its null hypothesis. > Either the experimenters try to show excess heat with calorimetry (too > hard) or they do the experimental test and the null hyposthesis in > different moments and not taking proper care with the control variables. > > Alberto. > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> hidden wire, RF supply, solar cell, can explain an apparent self-sustain. >> >> David have a good idea, that skeptic do the experiment themselves. >> some have done in their time and now they are here ;-) accused of fraud >> an delusion. >> >> moreover most skeptic refuse to experiment, and when experimenting have a >> tendency to reject any success and not to try long. >> It have to be easy. >> >> easy, with a theory, with a practical interest. >> >> I'm shocked today by the fact that most people instead of saying "it is >> unreal", say me "show me the reactor in home depot"... >> >> either a theory or an application. >> there is no room in Science for unexplained phenomenon that are not on >> the market. >> >> >> 2015-03-20 16:50 GMT+01:00 Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Alain, all of these difficulties can be overcome by a self sustained >>> system. 3.2x system can vaporize, condense at certain hight, and use the >>> fall of water to generate power. >>> >> >> >
