From: Eric Walker
Ø We should be encouraging and not take too critical an eye to attempts such as the one by Lunden and Lidgren. In addition, we should be open to fragments of insight that might be hidden in such attempts. Maybe so … but... there are limits to gullibility. This attempt at a publishable scientific paper could actually be a spoof – it is that bad. Maybe the intent is to shame Mats – or Rossi, or the whole field by promoting a spoof? Can you rule this out? The silliness of a few of these errors (college level physics) is awesome. The only thing missing is a date of “April 1”.
