Jones Do you have ghosts at home? How can this be to shame either Mats or Rossi. If it is a 1 of April joke then you have certainly taken the edge off it. Besides the people involved would not risk their careers for an April 1 joke. Nobody can say you did not see through it if it is one. The problem is if there are certain aspects that are correct because 'the book' was off and a small detail is to be correcting the book. Reading Peter's blog today and the following: *6) This is Jean-Francois Geneste's second theory paper:" LENR- from experiment to theory" presented a few hours ago at Toulouse, absolutely remarkable:* *https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1_tFmz65k8BUGc3Um92SF9xSUozbGM5ZDFIWXpRLUViMmZB/view?usp=sharing <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1_tFmz65k8BUGc3Um92SF9xSUozbGM5ZDFIWXpRLUViMmZB/view?usp=sharing>* makes me believe there are more to discover than is discovered.
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com [email protected] +1 916 436 1899 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 YCDBSOYA On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > *From:* Eric Walker > > > > Ø We should be encouraging and not take too critical an eye to attempts > such as the one by Lunden and Lidgren. In addition, we should be open to > fragments of insight that might be hidden in such attempts. > > > > Maybe so … but... there are limits to gullibility. This attempt at a > publishable scientific paper could actually be a spoof – it is that bad. > > > > Maybe the intent is to shame Mats – or Rossi, or the whole field by > promoting a spoof? Can you rule this out? > > > > The silliness of a few of these errors (college level physics) is awesome. > The only thing missing is a date of “April 1”. > > > > > > >
