I see some of my favorite words in that * Geneste *paper. You might have
had this * Geneste *information available to you right here on vortex.

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Lennart Thornros <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Jones
> Do you have ghosts at home?
> How can this be to shame either Mats or Rossi.
> If it is a 1 of April joke then you have certainly taken the edge off it.
> Besides the people involved would not risk their careers for an April 1
> joke.
> Nobody can say you did not see through it if it is one.
> The problem is if there are certain aspects that are correct because 'the
> book' was off and a small detail is to be correcting the book.
> Reading Peter's blog today and the following:
> *6) This is Jean-Francois Geneste's second theory paper:" LENR- from
> experiment to theory" presented a few hours ago at Toulouse, absolutely
> remarkable:*
> *https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1_tFmz65k8BUGc3Um92SF9xSUozbGM5ZDFIWXpRLUViMmZB/view?usp=sharing
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1_tFmz65k8BUGc3Um92SF9xSUozbGM5ZDFIWXpRLUViMmZB/view?usp=sharing>*
> makes me believe there are more to discover than is discovered.
>
> Best Regards ,
> Lennart Thornros
>
> www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com
> [email protected]
> +1 916 436 1899
> 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648
> YCDBSOYA
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> *From:* Eric Walker
>>
>>
>>
>> Ø  We should be encouraging and not take too critical an eye to attempts
>> such as the one by Lunden and Lidgren.  In addition, we should be open to
>> fragments of insight that might be hidden in such attempts.
>>
>>
>>
>> Maybe so … but... there are limits to gullibility. This attempt at a
>> publishable scientific paper could actually be a spoof – it is that bad.
>>
>>
>>
>> Maybe the intent is to shame Mats – or Rossi, or the whole field by
>> promoting a spoof? Can you rule this out?
>>
>>
>>
>> The silliness of a few of these errors (college level physics) is
>> awesome. The only thing missing is a date of “April 1”.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to