These tracks are produced by analog black holes call "dark mode surface plasmon polaritons" (dark mode SPP). it is well know that these polariton solitons produce monopole magnetic fields. Being a black hole, the inside of the soliton contains negative energy due to the fact that loads of power are being projected as anapole magnetism. This power projection segregates the vacuum into positive and negative energy, Things that travel in negative vacuum go faster than light in a neutral vacuum as found in the EMthruster experiments.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:38 PM, AlanG <[email protected]> wrote: > Regarding Geneste's paper, the 'strange radiation' tracks described were > replicated by Keith Fredericks and reported at ICCF18: > > <http://www.ecoinventions.ca/iccf-18-keith-fredericks-possibility-of-tachyon/> > http://www.ecoinventions.ca/iccf-18-keith-fredericks-possibility-of-tachyon/ > His analysis suggested they might be superluminal tachyons. > > > On 10/16/2015 12:38 PM, Lennart Thornros wrote: > > Jones > Do you have ghosts at home? > How can this be to shame either Mats or Rossi. > If it is a 1 of April joke then you have certainly taken the edge off it. > Besides the people involved would not risk their careers for an April 1 > joke. > Nobody can say you did not see through it if it is one. > The problem is if there are certain aspects that are correct because 'the > book' was off and a small detail is to be correcting the book. > Reading Peter's blog today and the following: > *6) This is Jean-Francois Geneste's second theory paper:" LENR- from > experiment to theory" presented a few hours ago at Toulouse, absolutely > remarkable:* > * > <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1_tFmz65k8BUGc3Um92SF9xSUozbGM5ZDFIWXpRLUViMmZB/view?usp=sharing>https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1_tFmz65k8BUGc3Um92SF9xSUozbGM5ZDFIWXpRLUViMmZB/view?usp=sharing > <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1_tFmz65k8BUGc3Um92SF9xSUozbGM5ZDFIWXpRLUViMmZB/view?usp=sharing>* > makes me believe there are more to discover than is discovered. > > Best Regards , > Lennart Thornros > > www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com > [email protected] > +1 916 436 1899 > 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 > YCDBSOYA > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> *From:* Eric Walker >> >> >> >> Ø We should be encouraging and not take too critical an eye to attempts >> such as the one by Lunden and Lidgren. In addition, we should be open to >> fragments of insight that might be hidden in such attempts. >> >> >> >> Maybe so … but... there are limits to gullibility. This attempt at a >> publishable scientific paper could actually be a spoof – it is that bad. >> >> >> >> Maybe the intent is to shame Mats – or Rossi, or the whole field by >> promoting a spoof? Can you rule this out? >> >> >> >> The silliness of a few of these errors (college level physics) is >> awesome. The only thing missing is a date of “April 1”. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >
