I.H. has done nothing wrong. I.H. has simply set up a business and an R&D plan that the new changes in the patent laws have made possible.
It goes like this. Acquire as many patents and ideas as possible, mix, match, and blend them together, put them in an innovation blender, and produce a hybrid technology that is better than the sum of all your patent acquisitions from your stable of inventors. Rossi being from the old country may not like this new way of doing business in America, but the companies in the U.S. have paid the politicians handsomely for these changes in the IP handling laws and now they want to use the laws to their full potential. When you make your living as a snake charmer, you must recognize that there is a possibility of being struck. On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Craig Haynie <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>He says he has not read the Penon report yet, so he cannot judge. The > people at I.H. have read it. At this point, we can only compare Rossi's > evaluation with I.H.'s. In my informed opinion, they are better at > calorimetry, so it is likely they are right. > > Does the license agreement look like IH can interpret it? It reads as > though the ERV certifies that the device complied with a set of > specifications. If it did, then the ERV certifies it. > > Section 5. Guaranteed Performance. > > "The ERV (or another party acceptable to the Company and Leonardo) will be > engaged to confirm in writing the Guaranteed Performance." > > I don't see where IH has the authority under the agreement to make any > kind of judgment on the report. > > Craig > > > On 04/10/2016 10:37 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > > a.ashfield < <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: > > >> You write. "I know how the people at I.H. do it," >> How do you know that? > > > As I said, I have met with them and discussed this with them. > > > >> I doubt anyone who writes about this story knows the players better than >> Mats Lewan. I judge him technically competent. > > > He says he has not read the Penon report yet, so he cannot judge. The > people at I.H. have read it. At this point, we can only compare Rossi's > evaluation with I.H.'s. In my informed opinion, they are better at > calorimetry, so it is likely they are right. > > I am not talking about personality, motivation, or anything else. I have > narrowed this down to one question. Who is better at evaluating > calorimetry? In my opinion, I.H. is, but I could be wrong. > > I take the two press releases at face value. I am assuming that Rossi > means what he says, and I.H. means what they say. If I.H. actually thought > the machine works, they would be crazy not to pay him the $89 million. > > > >> I get the feeling Rossi simply doesn't care about making a foolproof demo. > > > He must do this if he wants the $89 million. That is what is stipulated in > the contract. > > - Jed > > >
