Rossi uses the Mouse/Cat setup to amplify the COP by using multiple satellite unpowered reactors. Nobody has replicated this setup yet.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > *From:* Jack Cole > > Thanks Dave. I would love to see a solid report. I still have no > alternative explanation for some of the early results I saw in my own > experiments, but the lack of reproducibility makes me suspect that I missed > some unknown error. > > I just have trouble believing that Rossi would send a lawsuit to IH rather > than even one of his old supposedly working 10KW units if he had anything > that worked reliably! I think 100M dollars is worth a week in NC > demonstrating to anyone at IH how to make it work. > > Jack, > > Good post and let me fill in a few of the gaps, since the devil is in the > details and the scam becomes crystal clear when all the details are all > presented together. > > First - There is no doubt in my mind that Rossi can show anomalous thermal > gain. > It has been done with Ni-H for 25 years, starting with Piantelli and > Thermacore. > > Second – This disagreement is not just about showing an energy anomaly – > and making it run reliably. To get the 100 million, according to the > contract, Rossi has to demonstrate an astounding COP of 6. That has never > been done reliably and would be the breakthrough, if true. > > All of us who have been around this field are convinced, that with a properly > done experiment COP of about 1.5 is doable – even old had. Thermacore, > one the top companies in thermal engineering - ran multiple reactors for > over a year at COP 1.5 average in the nineties - and their proof was > overwhelming… but despite all efforts, they could not make the gain go > higher than 1.5 and fossil fuel was cheap then. > > Rossi can do the normal Ni-H version, we must assume, and get COP 1.5. If > he is good, he may have pushed the gain to COP ~2-3. That would be > admittedly a valuable advance, but falls short of the big bucks in the > contract. The reason that Rossi and his stooges are dishonest here, and have > resorted to using the air-for-steam cheat which Goat-Guy discovered - is > that AR has to make the gain seem much higher than it is to get the big > bucks. > > He cannot do that without cheating – apparently, or otherwise there is no > reason not to demonstrate this to real third party expert. > > When IH’s pleadings arrive, and it will probably take a few weeks perhaps > – this is most likely what they will say. They may even ask that the > court appoint an expert to do independent testing – and this should > please everyone … except a cheater. > >
