Sadly, it should be mentioned that John Dash passed away this Month. http://news.newenergytimes.net/2016/04/21/lenr-pioneer-john-dash-dies/
-----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene Hi Robin, You misunderstand. I am not trying to explain of validate Mills version of titanium as a hydrino catalyst. He clearly got it wrong for this element, at least for any parameters below plasma conditions. There is no way on earth that his theory can explain the results I mentioned from Professor Dash and the others, who found that Ti was more active than palladium in his experiments which were at ambient. Of course, one could say that titanium was active for another reason besides f/H but that goes against common sense. As does the suggestion that Dash missed another active catalyst at work or that he was doing "cold fusion" which automatically negates a fractional hydrogen pathway. My effort was aimed at showing a possible way of using the most intuitive part of Mills theory (the Rydberg/Hartree values) in a revised version, not Mills version - which can show that titanium is indeed the one and only catalyst which can work at the lowest possible temperature, due to its low ionization multiple of the first electron. This is not anti-Mills so much as it is Mills-inspired. It involves multibody reactions, as the tradeoff.
