Jed, Do I understand that you have seen the actual test data and have determined that zero power in excess of the input is achieved? This is a strong position that you are taking and should not be stated without absolute certainty.
I am waiting until I see the proof before drawing such a conclusion. The evidence is looking bad for Rossi at the moment due to many of the facts you mention, but I need convincing. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Tue, May 17, 2016 9:33 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Validity of E-Cat 1 MW plant test Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote: I think it is pretty much obvious that I don't believe you. Or any of the other people here. You have no reason to doubt me. You know that I have seen the data, and that I am capable of doing ordinary, elementary calorimetry. You know that Rossi and Penon said they would not allow anyone to see the customer machinery, so obviously they are either world-class idiots or frauds. Anyone who say "I won't let you see the machinery that uses this heat" has zero credibility, to 5 significant decimal places. People who believed Rossi before should instantly disbelieve him, based on that statement alone. You do not even need to see all the other idiotic mistakes he made. You have no information from Rossi about the calorimetry, other than the statement that he says he will not let people see the most critical aspect of it, and the most obvious proof of his claim. You have no reason to believe anything he says. - Jed
