David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: Jed, > > Do I understand that you have seen the actual test data and have > determined that zero power in excess of the input is achieved?
Yes, as I have said several times, I have seen some data. Rossi's methods are so bad, the data is a godawful mess, but there is no large excess heat. 1 MW is utterly ridiculous. Based on some common sense observations I doubt there is any at all. People who have seen more data than me are sure there is no heat. > This is a strong position that you are taking and should not be stated > without absolute certainty. > Absolute certainty can only be established by examining the customer's machinery, which Rossi did not allow. He did not allow other essential observations and tests. Fortunately, I gather experts were finally able to work around him and get the facts. I have not seen all the facts but I trust those experts. Now that you know Rossi explicitly refused to allow an inspection of the customer's equipment, you should realize he has zero credibility, and you should not believe a word he says. - Jed
