Craig Haynie <[email protected]> wrote:
> However, if Rossi believed he had something real, then there were valid > reasons not to allow IH to analyze their own data, or get too involved with > the validation of the device, at the stage which occurred last year in the > process, when the agreement was signed. This does not make any sense. Anyone can analyze the data. You walk in the door, look at the instruments, and do the math. An experienced HVAC engineer can tell the glance whether there is excess heat from flow calorimetry. I can figure it out in ten minutes even without going there. A mistake in calorimetry does not come from numbers themselves. It is about how accurate they are, and what they mean. That is, the choice of instruments, the placement, configuration, calibration methods, verification methods and so on. Look at the mistakes in calorimetry made by Mizuno and I with his setup, or the mistakes made at Lugano and by others in various reports. The numbers are right; the methods and interpretations were wrong. > The primary reason before the test, to prevent IH from doing their own > evaluation . . . You cannot help but do your own evaluation. The answer is right in front of you. - Jed
