Bob Higgins <[email protected]> wrote: The flow meter used only seems to read out visually in integer m^3 with a > mechanical digital roll-over indicator (probably readable to 1/2 digit). > However, the flow meter is available optionally with a pulse output that > apparently pulses for each 0.5 liter passing. Do we know if there was > electronic acquisition of the flow count? >
I have heard it did not, but I could be wrong about that. I have heard they kept handwritten logs, which were a mess. The data looks to me like it was transcribed from handwritten logs, with errors and truncation typical of that. Sigh . . . I am probably from the last generation of people who recognize data that was collected by hand. This is like being able to recognize computation done on a slide rule, with 1 or 2 digit precision. There could be electronic data elsewhere. There was something in the court filings about electronic data, as pointed out by Jack Cole above: "There supposedly is raw data, which AR as referred to as millions of data points. Unfortunately, if this data exists, it was never shared with IH by either Fabiani or Penon despite multiple requests and contractual obligations. . . ." I have no knowledge of this. - Jed
