Bob,
I read that Penon had all the instruments connected, but of course that is not proof he did. If I had been responsible for monitoring a plant with so much riding on the outcome I know I would log everything automatically. No one would want to spend 24 hours a day there, so it is logical that he did.

If Penon did that, it would explain why Rossi is so confident. As others have iout, IH has failed to supply simple proof that the plant didn't work. Just suppositions of how Rossi could have cheated. IH apparently lied about Vaughn not being a manager at Cherokee so they must be worried.


On 8/9/2016 2:53 PM, Bob Higgins wrote:
The flow meter used only seems to read out visually in integer m^3 with a mechanical digital roll-over indicator (probably readable to 1/2 digit). However, the flow meter is available optionally with a pulse output that apparently pulses for each 0.5 liter passing. Do we know if there was electronic acquisition of the flow count? If so, this electronic measure of the flow would be in increments of 0.5 liter even though the mechanical digital roll-over meter indicates in increments of 1000 liters.

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 12:16 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:

    I now read that all the ERV's equipment was connected to his
    computer and recorded the readings electronically. It will be
    interesting to compare the data logged with what Jed is claiming

    Engineer48, who has direct contacy with Rossi, writes:
    "Rossi told me this meter registers zero for backflow.
    The flow is very constant as the big prime and multiple smaller
    top up pumps all have multiple 1 way valves and micro computer
    controlled flow regulation against varying pressure.
    The engineers basically dial in / program the pumps for 1,500kg/hr
    and that is what the condensate circulation system pumps deliver,
    24/7/365."


    Weaver told Engineer48 that they had lost tract of the reactors IH
    shipped to Lugano.   - Unbelievable.

    Remember the E-Cat underwent trials at IH before commuting to the
1 MW plant and it was Rossi, not IH who filed the suit in court. If the E-Cats never worked why would Rosssi shut down some to
    repair them?
    What with IH claiming Vaughn was not a manager at Cherokee and the
    mistake riddled Exhibit 5 no wonder Cherokee has spent big bucks
    to retain APCO and Jones-Day...  In essence, Ih have not provide
    any hard evidence to show the 1 MW plant didn't work and that
    should have been easy if it didn't without taking 66 pages.of
    legalese, speculating on possibilities and ad hominems.



Reply via email to