Everything else besides the ERV's report are technicalities that are
unlikely to effect the jury's decision. IH has to prove Penon's report
was wrong by an order of magnitude.
On 8/9/2016 5:55 PM, Bob Higgins wrote:
As I have previously said, this is a private legal dispute with no
outcome that is going to release useful information to the LENR
community.
It is a quite uphill battle for Rossi. He has to prove that he met
ALL of the requirements of the license agreement that entitle him to
the next round of payments - this is more than the guaranteed
performance test. IH only has to prove that at least one aspect of
the agreement has not been met and Rossi will be found not entitled to
such payment yet. I don't have enough information to say who will
win, and I have 0-zero-0 stake in the outcome. Vortex pundits will
also have no effect on the outcome. I will let the legal process run
its course with minimal personal angst.
But it is educational to see where proof fails.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:36 PM, a.ashfield <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Bob,
I read that Penon had all the instruments connected, but of course
that is not proof he did.
If I had been responsible for monitoring a plant with so much
riding on the outcome I know I would log everything
automatically. No one would want to spend 24 hours a day there,
so it is logical that he did.
If Penon did that, it would explain why Rossi is so confident. As
others have iout, IH has failed to supply simple proof that the
plant didn't work. Just suppositions of how Rossi could have
cheated. IH apparently lied about Vaughn not being a manager at
Cherokee so they must be worried.
On 8/9/2016 2:53 PM, Bob Higgins wrote:
The flow meter used only seems to read out visually in integer
m^3 with a mechanical digital roll-over indicator (probably
readable to 1/2 digit). However, the flow meter is available
optionally with a pulse output that apparently pulses for each
0.5 liter passing. Do we know if there was electronic acquisition
of the flow count? If so, this electronic measure of the flow
would be in increments of 0.5 liter even though the mechanical
digital roll-over meter indicates in increments of 1000 liters.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 12:16 PM, a.ashfield
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I now read that all the ERV's equipment was connected to his
computer and recorded the readings electronically. It will be
interesting to compare the data logged with what Jed is claiming
Engineer48, who has direct contacy with Rossi, writes:
"Rossi told me this meter registers zero for backflow.
The flow is very constant as the big prime and multiple
smaller top up pumps all have multiple 1 way valves and micro
computer controlled flow regulation against varying pressure.
The engineers basically dial in / program the pumps for
1,500kg/hr and that is what the condensate circulation system
pumps deliver, 24/7/365."
Weaver told Engineer48 that they had lost tract of the
reactors IH shipped to Lugano. - Unbelievable.
Remember the E-Cat underwent trials at IH before commuting to
the 1 MW plant and it was Rossi, not IH who filed the suit in
court. If the E-Cats never worked why would Rosssi shut down
some to repair them?
What with IH claiming Vaughn was not a manager at Cherokee
and the mistake riddled Exhibit 5 no wonder Cherokee has
spent big bucks to retain APCO and Jones-Day... In essence,
Ih have not provide any hard evidence to show the 1 MW plant
didn't work and that should have been easy if it didn't
without taking 66 pages.of legalese, speculating on
possibilities and ad hominems.
