a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: Everything else besides the ERV's report are technicalities that are > unlikely to effect the jury's decision. >
Are you serious?!? I.H. will present iron-clad proof that Rossi is a fraud, with a fake company, no excess heat, and no machine in the fake company. Do you really believe the jury will ignore that? Those are not "technicalities." I.H. has one of the best law firms in the country. I am sure they know more about juries and trials than you do. IH has to prove Penon's report was wrong by an order of magnitude. > Anyone could do that, easily. All you have to do is show that the pretend customer site had no equipment and emitted not heat. You don't even need to get into the details of calorimetry. - Jed
