a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:
> As others have iout, IH has failed to supply simple proof that the plant > didn't work. > IH has provided simple proof the plant did not work! Look at Exhibit 5. Rossi inadvertently provided simple proof that the plant does not work. His data shows that, as described in Exhibit 5. > Just suppositions of how Rossi could have cheated. > These are not "suppositions." This is ironclad proof, such as rust showing that the pipe was half full for extended periods. Anyone seeing the pipe would know it was half full. And, such as showing there was no heat coming from the pretend customer site. > IH apparently lied about Vaughn not being a manager at Cherokee so they > must be worried. > No one said he is not a manager at Cherokee. They say the two organizations are separate. A person can work at two different organizations simultaneously. - Jed
