As I have previously said, this is a private legal dispute with no outcome that is going to release useful information to the LENR community.
It is a quite uphill battle for Rossi. He has to prove that he met ALL of the requirements of the license agreement that entitle him to the next round of payments - this is more than the guaranteed performance test. IH only has to prove that at least one aspect of the agreement has not been met and Rossi will be found not entitled to such payment yet. I don't have enough information to say who will win, and I have 0-zero-0 stake in the outcome. Vortex pundits will also have no effect on the outcome. I will let the legal process run its course with minimal personal angst. But it is educational to see where proof fails. On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:36 PM, a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > Bob, > I read that Penon had all the instruments connected, but of course that is > not proof he did. > If I had been responsible for monitoring a plant with so much riding on > the outcome I know I would log everything automatically. No one would > want to spend 24 hours a day there, so it is logical that he did. > > If Penon did that, it would explain why Rossi is so confident. As others > have iout, IH has failed to supply simple proof that the plant didn't > work. Just suppositions of how Rossi could have cheated. IH apparently > lied about Vaughn not being a manager at Cherokee so they must be worried. > > > On 8/9/2016 2:53 PM, Bob Higgins wrote: > > The flow meter used only seems to read out visually in integer m^3 with a > mechanical digital roll-over indicator (probably readable to 1/2 digit). > However, the flow meter is available optionally with a pulse output that > apparently pulses for each 0.5 liter passing. Do we know if there was > electronic acquisition of the flow count? If so, this electronic measure > of the flow would be in increments of 0.5 liter even though the mechanical > digital roll-over meter indicates in increments of 1000 liters. > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 12:16 PM, a.ashfield <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I now read that all the ERV's equipment was connected to his computer and >> recorded the readings electronically. It will be interesting to compare the >> data logged with what Jed is claiming >> >> Engineer48, who has direct contacy with Rossi, writes: >> "Rossi told me this meter registers zero for backflow. >> The flow is very constant as the big prime and multiple smaller top up >> pumps all have multiple 1 way valves and micro computer controlled flow >> regulation against varying pressure. >> The engineers basically dial in / program the pumps for 1,500kg/hr and >> that is what the condensate circulation system pumps deliver, 24/7/365." >> >> >> Weaver told Engineer48 that they had lost tract of the reactors IH >> shipped to Lugano. - Unbelievable. >> >> Remember the E-Cat underwent trials at IH before commuting to the 1 MW >> plant and it was Rossi, not IH who filed the suit in court. If the E-Cats >> never worked why would Rosssi shut down some to repair them? >> What with IH claiming Vaughn was not a manager at Cherokee and the >> mistake riddled Exhibit 5 no wonder Cherokee has spent big bucks to retain >> APCO and Jones-Day... In essence, Ih have not provide any hard evidence to >> show the 1 MW plant didn't work and that should have been easy if it didn't >> without taking 66 pages.of legalese, speculating on possibilities and ad >> hominems. >> > > >
