FYI...The company is a chinese company based in England. The validity of the company has be verified by the U.S. government.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > > Everything else besides the ERV's report are technicalities that are >> unlikely to effect the jury's decision. >> > > Are you serious?!? I.H. will present iron-clad proof that Rossi is a > fraud, with a fake company, no excess heat, and no machine in the fake > company. Do you really believe the jury will ignore that? Those are not > "technicalities." > > I.H. has one of the best law firms in the country. I am sure they know > more about juries and trials than you do. > > > IH has to prove Penon's report was wrong by an order of magnitude. >> > > Anyone could do that, easily. All you have to do is show that the pretend > customer site had no equipment and emitted not heat. You don't even need to > get into the details of calorimetry. > > - Jed > >
