>>>Just because I do not spoon-feed you examples of people who use the legal
>>>system to steal and commit crimes, that does not mean they do not exist.
Unfortunately the "people" that would say that a crime has been committed by
the legal system would generally be the "people" that the legal system has
judged guilty. Prison is supposedly full of innocent "people" that have been
found guilty; at least that is what most of the "people" in jail would say. --
following the maxim: "they would say that wouldn't they". I can however tell
you that based on my experience on jury service that I endorse the view that
the "law is an ass." Most "people" who are street-wise would probably agree.
Historically there are many interesting cases of injustice such as the Dreyfus
affair, which had high profile; which makes one wonder how many injustices
that get glossed over when they are low profile.
On Saturday, 4 February 2017, 16:36, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
wrote:
a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:
You are getting desperate if the Mafia is the only example you can come up
with.
There are plenty of other examples. You can do your own homework and find them.
Just because I do not spoon-feed you examples of people who use the legal
system to steal and commit crimes, that does not mean they do not exist. You
can look, for example, at bankers who loan money to elderly people, and then
sue to take their houses when they make a $0.27 error in a payment. Or they
tell the elderly person that to have the rate adjusted lower, the person should
skip a payment -- and when they do, the banker repossess. That's using the
court system as an accessory to a crime.
(Those techniques were perfected by our new Treasury Sec. Mnuchin, who made
several hundred million dollars bilking elderly people.)
News to me that Rossi goes around threatening physical harm to IH personnel.
I did not say that. On the other hand, he did learn his techniques in Italy,
where the Mafia and other gangs have a great deal of influence and power.
I would say that leaving pollution in the ground that cost the local
municipality 40 million euros to clean up is physical harm.
As for Santilli, "It was then made clear to me (Film director John Jopson) that
if the footage was exposed as a hoax before the show aired, the ratings would
suffer."
Beats me how you think that is Santilli taking a victim to court.
He tried to take me to court! Gene Mallove had to spend tens of thousands of
dollars to get rid of Santilli and his bloodsucking lawsuits.
- Jed
