On Jul 31, 2007, at 3:59 PM, Michel Jullian wrote:

I would expect that *typically*, setting the cathode potential to -20
KeV or more would make for a high surface electron fugacity.

I suspect some heresy here (could I be seeing heretics everywhere tonight?), let me try you before we go further. Whether your cathode is at ground potential or 20 kV below, or even 20MV below for that matter, if it's surrounded by an anode 5V above its potential then it will have exactly the same surface charge, do you agree with this assertion?

Sure, but I haven't been talking about an electrolytic cathode surrounded by an anode 5 V above its potential. I've been talking about HV loaded cathodes, or electrolysis done like this:


                        GGGGGGGGGGGG
                        G          G
                        G          G
                        G          G
                        G          G
        |  +          X|G          G++
        |..+..........X|G          G++
        |  +          X|G          G++
        |  +          X|G          G++
        |  +          X|G          G++
        ---------------|G          G
                       |G          G
                       |G          G
                       |G          G
                       |G          G
                       |GGGGGGGGGGGG
                       |
                    Laser

     Key:
         -| - Thin glass
          G - Surface of thick insulator
          + - Low voltage electrolysis anode
          X - Thin film CF cathode at ground potential
         ++ - High voltage anode
         .. - Electrolyte level

         Figure 1 - High electron fugacity experiment

A useful variation is to make the cell high voltage negative, floating the electrolysis power supply, and making the anode "++" in Figure 1 ground.

I've given the configuration the name "back side cell" in the rough beginnings of a paper at

http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/DeflationFusion.pdf

The fusion surface is the back HV side, or just under that back side.

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/



Reply via email to