Mark Iverson quoted John Coleman (Weather channel) as saying:

<<The compound carbon dioxide makes up only 38 out of every 100,000 particles in the atmosphere, he said. "That's about twice as what there were in the atmosphere in the time we started burning fossil fuels, so it's gone up, but it's still a tiny compound," Coleman said. "So how can that tiny trace
compound have such a significant effect on temperature?>>

This proves beyond all doubt that Coleman is either being deliberately deceptive or doesn't understand what he is talking about.

The figure is more or less correct but considering that the majority of the atmospheric gases are not greenhouse gases, his statement is HIGHLY misleading - whether deliberately or otherwise, one can only speculate. This deceit has been used a lot by the denialist lobby and has been comprehensively destroyed many times.

The main gases in the atmosphere are nitrogen and oxygen, which make up 78% and 21% of the volume of air respectively. The remaining 1% of the atmospheric gases is made up of trace gases. These include the noble gases of which the most abundant is argon. Other noble gases include neon, helium, krypton and xenon. The remaining trace gases include the greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, water vapour and ozone, so-called because they are involved in the Earth natural greenhouse effect which keeps the planet warmer than it would be without an atmosphere. Although CO2 is only around 383 ppm - 0.0383% - of the total atmosphere, it is responsible for about 9–26% of the total greenhouse effect. Water vapour, although seemingly a greater contributor at 36–70%, cannot increase in the atmosphere (extra humidity always precipitates out very quickly as rain or snow - which would seem to nail as a non-starter that "gigatonnes of seawater" solution that cropped up here recently) and so is NOT far more important as a greenhouse gas than CO2 is - this is another denialist deceit that they keep on plugging, again long after it has been proved to be false.


Nick Palmer

On the side of the Planet - and the people - because they're worth it

Reply via email to