Horace, I followed circulating monatomic gas through variations in the plate spacing to initiate plasma by snaking gas back and forth between different size cavities and can see where this would increase the inertia of your fixture but I have a feeling you may need to move the cavities as well if you want to create thrust. By circulating your "cells" as hydrogenated porous metal powder thru axial coils while turning the plasma on and off to create a differential. I noticed some materials smart people on this list - can anyone suggest a good porous conductive powder -Calcium?
Fran but . You are trying to reverse the anomaly and use Casimir force to push flux. You need to move the hydrogen orbitals associated with the plasma (which may also need defects) to Snip This Haisch and Moddel patent is very similar to the thruster concept I posted here in 2003: http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/ZPE-CasimirThrust.pdf Reply Horrace I just read your Inertial paper you referenced from 2003. You were way ahead of your time and think you should return to that paper and update it to reflect some of the information we can glean from BLP and Jovion. We now know that keeping the gas monatomic is important and we also know that black light plasma should be emitted when linkage to vacuum flux is established. It doesn't matter who's theory is correct about how the energy is transferred as long as we agree the plasma emitted is from the hydrogen. I recall reading that Mills' showed off a Black Light plasma lamp which gave the witness a sunburn and that a Dutch physicist(Kr..?) is trying to repeat the lamp in Europe. If such a lamp were available it would make a simple test for your thruster in that a black light plasma lamp with a portable supply on one side of a beam balance and equal weight on the other would exhibit different inertia when on vs off. Adding or subtracting weights while the plasma is exhibited should have different frictional linkage with the ZPE field and slow the settle time. I am not saying it would levitate in fact the opposite is likely in that it would increase inertia making the lamp harder to move. Fran -----Original Message----- From: Horace Heffner [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 10:55 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hydrino represents Lorentz contraction in the opposite direction from event horizon On Jul 23, 2009, at 6:01 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: > By the way, the patent which apparently started Frank off on this, and > the effort to produce a device based on it, are described here: > > http://peswiki.com/index.php/ > Directory:Jovion_Corporation_and_Zero_Point_Energy > > It's an interesting concept: squash atoms through tiny cavities which > force them to give up energy, and then let the inflate again with > energy > from the zero point field. > > So you sort of treat the atoms like little sponges; squeeze out their > energy using tiny cavities, then let them loose to "sponge up" some > more > from the ZPF. This Haisch and Moddel patent is very similar to the thruster concept I posted here in 2003: http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/ZPE-CasimirThrust.pdf The difference between concepts is I proposed extracting momentum from the energy/(inertial mass) change, dp/dt change, instead of the energy difference. Both concepts have the difficulty that the energy/ mass change is not experimentally verified, and thus not quantifiable for engineering purposes. By converting mass/energy changes in cavity traverses to momentum gain, however, energy is then made available by converting the thrust into device momentum, especially for space propulsion. Also, if sufficient momentum is gained with respect to drive energy input, then such a thruster drive can be mounted on a large armature of an electric generator in order to produce electrical energy directly. Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
