[Snip]
Your frequent use of the term "vacuum fluctuations" adds to the
confusion in your writing. The term "vacuum fluctuations" is
typically reserved for the particle aspect of vacuum energy, the
creation of virtual particle pairs, i.e. electron-positron, proton-
neutron, strange pairs, etc. Virtual particle pairs pop into
existence for an amount of time that does not violate Heisenberg.
This has nothing to do with the ZPF exclusion from cavities.
[Reply]
I disagree; I contend the change in the ratio of short to long vacuum
flux is the principle difference inside the cavity vs outside. I
realize
flux are very transitory but they are the force that keeps the Puthoff
atomic orbital from decaying and the same force that Casimir plates
sum
to produce the exclusion field. I only think of the ZPF in terms of
its
population and ratio of different wavelength vacuum flux but your
comment makes me consider the "duty factor" when flux are present
vs not
present. What is your concept of ZPF if not flux population?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
---------
[Snip]
My intuition is this method if possible would be very difficult as
opposed to exploiting the difference inside cavity vs outside
cavity in
the ratio of short to long vacuum flux.
Uh..., exactly what do you think I exploited? Read:
[Reply]
ok, I get your point that the ratio is the source of mechanical
motion
closing the plates. From your other papers I suspect you also prefer
fixed plates and moving gas but I agree a mechanical system could
work.
----------------------------------------------------
[Snip]
Somehow Mills' is encouraging
this changed ratio of flux to disassociate gas atoms that nature
immediately repairs to set up a runaway Plasma oscillation.
I don't know anything about this. I have not heard of the ZPF being
used to disassociate gas atoms. Do you have a reference?
[Reply]
The disassociation of gas atoms is something I thought could be
assumed,
We have photons in the form of black light plasma coming from a
"device"
when hydrogen is present. The spectrum is wrong for hydrogen but since
the device encourages the hydrino state the prediction for spectrum is
unknown until the forces at play are finally established.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
---
[Snip]
My impression of all this is the potentials available from the ZPF
are
just not very big at atomic dimensions, and are typically of the
opposite kind, i.e. pressure causing, which sticks things together,
like the van der Waals force.
[Reply]
Ok but this same "pressure" applied in a rigid cavity where the
molecule
formed already "stuck" deep in a channel treats the metal lattice
like a
membrane to allow the atoms to escape one at a time. This is why
reports
of excess heat so often occur where monatomic gas is evolved.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
[Snip]
An intramolecule repulsive force,
Casimir pressure, only emerges at sub-ground state, AFAIK. It
essentially *defines* ground state . The existence of Casimir
pressure is one of the significant arguments that hydrinos must have
short half-lives if they exist at all.
[Reply]
I agree almost totally, assuming we agree the term "Casimir pressure"
defines the ratio of short to long flux then I can dispense with
some of
my refs to vacuum flux in favor of this term. I think this "Casimir
pressure" has a broad spectrum of 137 fractional quantum states where
the ground states appear smaller and 137 super states where the ground
state appears larger. I don't know if we will ever directly measure a
fractional quantum state outside of the cavity - removing the hydrino
from the cavity releases the pressure and it translates back to
hydrogen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
--
[Snip]
One way to generate excess heat by using Casimir cavity transversal
would be to send molecules through the cavity that are stuck together
by van der Waals forces. The cavity would reduce the ZPF and thus
unstick the molecules. This would produce a tiny amount of energy
per molecule pair unstuck, on the order of a small fraction of an eV,
but that is a lot of heat if the flow can be made large enough. This
is not ionization, nor plasma creation, but it is a possibly workable
concept for excess heat production. It also would verify the ZPF
experimentally.
[Reply]
Yes, it sounds workable but the amount of gas circulation suggests
this
is not as efficient as the Mill's plasma. I can't prove it but I
really
think the Mill's plasma is from reforming molecules or compounds that
are disassociated by vacuum flux.
Regards
Fran
