Mark,

 

It goes without saying that this was a hasty fiction put together to show
how this demo (or any similar demo by anyone) could be partially faked (i.e.
"enhanced") in a way that could fit into a coherent story. and certainly was
not intended to be anything more than that. I should have prefaced the post
- to make that clear. 

 

However, I am in the outspoken minority (minority of one?) who do not trust
Rossi to be honest about important details, especially when they contradict,
as they often do, more reliable sources. like the Swedish isotope analysis,
for instance.

 

However, I vaguely recall the video interview a week or so ago - with the
CEO of the Greek company . in which he indicated that a goodly portion of
the $100 million has already been released. Did anyone else catch this
interview?

 

Jones

 

 

From: Mark Iverson 

 

Items 5 and 7 are not fitting with the details that Rossi has stated, which
is that he ONLY receives money when the plant is producing energy... so
there is no "up-front cash".  Don't think that the scenario is consistent
with first-hand information...  

 

5)    At this time, Rossi is already arranging a deal with the Greeks,
possibly for far less money than was finalized after the demo.

 

7)    Then . flash . Rossi decides he can "enhance" the demo, and possibly
close the deal with the Greeks for more up-front cash - by using the low COP
of about 4 to heat a peroxide blend and get the 'apparent' COP up to maybe
30.

 

-Mark

 

  _____  

From: Jones 

First, don't get me wrong. I thought the Bologna demo was robust and
legitimate at the time, and still think it could have been strongly OU - but
less so than appearances might indicate. 

However, there is no real proof of any huge gain until better controls are
implemented. I agree fully with Horace that the demo was shoddy. However,
all of us must realize by now, that any further public testing CANNOT HELP
Rossi. Deals are signed and he has nothing to gain till he gets the megawatt
device ready.

 

A scenario which can answer a lot of questions would be this:

 

1)    Focardi, Piantelli and many others have built Ni-H experiments for
years that showed modest gain

2)    Mills has built Ni-H systems that purportedly show much higher gain

3)    Rossi teamed with Focardi circa 2006, and they were able to get a
system up to say - COP of 4 by using nanopowder and Mills' catalysts - maybe
less, but reliable.

4)    Focardi is in ill-health and recently asks for a public demo while he
can still enjoy it

5)    At this time, Rossi is already arranging a deal with the Greeks,
possibly for far less money than was finalized after the demo.

6)    Rossi decides to do the Bologna demo for the benefit of his old friend
and mentor

7)    Then . flash . Rossi decides he can "enhance" the demo, and possibly
close the deal with the Greeks for more up-front cash - by using the low COP
of about 4 to heat a peroxide blend and get the 'apparent' COP up to maybe
30.

8)    He would already know about this blend, since the Chinese have been
promoting it for a year or so.

9)    Then the demo in Bologna and the positive PR.

10) The Greeks see this demo, are very impressed, fear competition - and
sign the check in January for more than they wanted to. 

11) Of course a part of the funds are in escrow, but remember, Rossi can
still build reactors that are OU, so he can pull off something impressive in
the end, even without the peroxide boost and get the full payment. 

12) Thus he has worded the contract in such a way that in the end a showing
of strong overunity is the criterion - not the full 30-1 gain 

13) ERGO even without the 'enhancement' he used in the demo - he can be
successful on the contract clauses and claim his fee, but it might require
700 reactors to get to the megawatt instead of 100.

14) Even with 700 it still makes economic sense but at 3 cents per kW-hr
instead of 1 cent.

15) In the mean time Rossi thinks that by using U of Bologna, the Swedes and
others - to figure out the underlying details that he realizes he does not
know, he might actually get the device into a more robust range than his
fall-back gain (COP = ~4)

16) Everyone lives happily ever after

 

 

From: Jed Rothwell 

 

Jones Beene wrote:

Considerably less than the $100 million Euros that a Greek investor might be
willing to advance ..

Ha, ha. And how would this work now that they are testing it in Rossi's
absence? I imagine they will notice. 

 

JB: There will be no more public disclosures IMO.

 

Surely the hidden tank will run out, or they will try another source of
water.

 

JB: Part of the deal with the University is surely going to be a strong NDA
- till AR sez it's OK

 

BTW - calculations based on heat content can be thrown out the window with
peroxide blends, which produce cold steam with less energy than seems
physically possible .

 

 

 

Reply via email to