> Abd, > > If you reject W-L theory, what would you regard as the most reasonable > explanation for all of the transmutations reported? Is there a > particular paper that you could recommend. I'm too overwhelmed by the > complexity > of solid state reactions to take any side in the controversy. > > Thanks, > Lou Pagnucco
>From my "reading list" at >http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg58232.html Fralik's http://newenergytimes.com/v2/government/NASA/20111209NASA-Fralick-GRC-LENR-Workshop.pdf slide 14 Has a brief summary of peer-reviewed contenders. I'd start with : http://www.iscmns.org/CMNS/JCMNS-Vol4.pdf#page=40 OR at : http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BiberianJPjcondensedc.pdf read the whole issue, while you're there Includes latest by various authors, eg : A. Meulenberg and K.P. Sinha Chubb & Chubb - - - - For detailed papers I'd also look at : Kim's Bose Einstein Condensates papers http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/KimYEgeneralize.pdf 2011 Specifically addressing Rossi Ni H http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/KimYEboseeinste.pdf 2009 General theory, Pd D Chubb's Band States 2009 http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ChubbTAovercoming.pdf Note : they have a newer paper in iscmns Vol 4 And to cover D-D interactions, screening and the like Sinha : http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/SinhaKPamodelfore.pdf 2008 D-D resonance, phonons, lochons, shielding, coulomb Note : they have a newer paper in iscmns Vol 4 (I don't seem to have a link to Parmenter and Lamb, referenced by Fralik) NOTE : I'm not skilled enough to pick a theory ... but all of these address the "impossible" argument.
