________________________________
Von: Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Gesendet: 4:13 Freitag, 6.April 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Stimulation of LENR using dual lasers, creative engineering
needed
> Maybe it is the case of cooling the experiment with liquid nitrogen, to avoid
> self interference with the experiment.
> 8THz blackbody is a peak around 140K, so 71K is far away from that peak.
This sounds like too low a temperature.
My two cents:
1) using a blackbody to generate the 15&22THz will produce a small
power-density per area. My estimate is, that it will be in the 10 to
100uW range per mm2, depending on the bandwidth. Remember that this
radiation cannot be focused. So the target power-density can be at most
the source power-density.
2) another idea would be the coating of the (blackbody-source) with molecules,
which resonate at the desired frequencies.
Something akin to this here: "Laser spectroscopy and mass spectrometry of doped
clusters"
http://fys.kuleuven.be/vsm/nano/master.php?mastercat=5
3) If You think about (2) a bit, You get the impression, that it is more
effective to heat the target (NiH-reactant) directly, and let the
target do the sorting out of the frequencies via resonance. 22THz ->
approx 15um wavelength.
( Provided that the radiation need not be coherent or narrowband, ofcourse).
Which also gives an indication for the minimum/optimum-size
of the particles/crystals.
Surprisingly large! Not nano!
My general impression is, that this dual-laser stimulation maybe results in a
more pronounced effect, but is not necessary. Simple heating basically will do
the job also.
Plus maybe some RF-pulses (Godes/Brillouin, catalyst, secret sauce, whatever.)
Which would be consistent with the other LENR-experiments.
This is my common-sense-back of the napkin approach.
Laser-based stimulation in any case would be a costly solution.
Sufficient: maybe, necessary: not.
Guenter
2012/4/5 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com>
At 12:30 PM 4/5/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote:
>
>If you are not concerned with a narrow broad band, you could use a blackbody
>emission. According to Wien's displacement law, 14.8THz to 22.5THz,
>>
>>
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wien%27s_displacement_law#Frequency-dependent_formulation>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wien%27s_displacement_law#Frequency-dependent_formulation
>>
>>gives 251K to 387K.
>>
>The frequencies of interest are far infrared, or sometimes called
>mid-infrared. Blackbody emissions certainly exist in the range, but are are at
>low levels and are not coherent.
>
>I've been speculating, though, as an aside, that the erratic results of cold
>fusion might have to do with the presence or absence of environmental THz
>radiation. I don't know if anyone looked for this, and don't place a lot of
>weight on the idea....
>
>
