Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <[email protected]> wrote:
> Interpretations of work can involve theory. McKubre is an electrochemist, > not a nuclear physicist. While his opinions about theory may not exactly be > irrelevant, neither should we expect them to be authoritative . . . As far as I know, McKubre feels that Hagelstein's theories are the most helpful in the field. I have never heard or read anything from him about the W-L theory. I believe he is hoping to confirm Brillouin's calorimetry. That would not necessarily give credibility to their theory. It might, if -- for example -- they can control the reaction well, and their method of control is predicted by the theory. Cold fusion theories have not been useful or predictive so far. - Jed
