The god El, has also very polytheistic origins. Not that its also related
to the name Allah.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_(deity)

There are plenty of bibliography in that page to corroborate with that
information.


2013/1/2 Jojo Jaro <[email protected]>

> Lomax claims that it matters not what allah's origins were.  OK.  Because
> it is clear from archeological evidence that allah (al-ilah) was the pagan
> moon god of arabs.  He had 3 daughters that the koran initially said should
> be worshipped.  Later muhammed abrogated those verses saying that he was
> deceived by Satan.  Funny, can't allah, the supposed almighty god, protect
> his prophet from deception.  Can't allah keep his word (koran) pure from
> error?
>
> The kabah was where these pagans worshipped al-ilah.  The pagans walked
> around kabah stone just like the muslim do today.
>
> My friends, if you are reading this, please research this yourself.  Don't
> believe me, check it out yourself.
>
>
>
>
>
> Jojo
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Abd ul-Rahman Lomax" <
> [email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 3:38 AM
>
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Birther Myth? or Lomax lies
>
>
>  At 04:11 AM 1/2/2013, Jojo Jaro wrote:
>>
>>> That is where you are wrong my friend.  A TRUE Christian will not find a
>>> call to Idolatry beautiful.  A muslim call to prayer is a call to pray to a
>>> false god (allah the moon god) in front of an idol (kabah - a meteroite
>>> stone.)
>>>
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**No_true_Scotsman<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman>
>>
>> Is the call to prayer a call to idolatry? This brings up the Moon God
>> Allah argument, recognized immediately here, over six months ago, as
>> bigotry.
>>
>> The claim is that "Allah" is a Moon God, allegedly because it was a name
>> for a pre-Islamic god of the moon. That is arguing that the referent of a
>> word is controlled by its etymology. So if someone says, "Hey, Dennis is a
>> great guy!" they are praising Dionysius, the Greek God. Idolatry!
>>
>> No, Allah, *regardless of origin* -- and we don't care about origin, we
>> care about *present meaning* -- is God, and that's not in controversy among
>> Christians who speak Arabic, *except for those afflicted by the present
>> claims.* Very modern.
>>
>> And we do not have an idol in mind when we face Mecca, and the verse that
>> commands this only refers to the *direction*. It does not command worship
>> of the Ancient House. It says to face "the direction of the Sacred Masjid."
>> (Mosque is not an Arabic word, Masjid means, "place of prayer."
>>
>> I once had a prayer carpet, given to me by a Pakistani Muslim to whom it
>> was a beloved object, and it had a picture of the House on it. I had this
>> carpet for years, but it always, when I used it, didn't feel right. So,
>> years later, because I knew it was important to him, he had prayed with it
>> all over the world, I gave it back to him. He was insulted, it was part of
>> an unfortunate sequence of events. This was over thirty years ago, by the
>> way.
>>
>> We don't worship the House, we don't even worship the direction, we
>> merely face it, as best we know. We seek direction from God, and we respond
>> to what God has commanded.
>>
>> Ka'aba does not mean a stone. It means cube, and refers to the overall
>> shape of the whole House. There is an ancient stone set in a corner of the
>> Ka'aba. It performs no central role in Islam. Because there is a tradition
>> that the stone was *reset* in the corner of the Cube by action of the
>> Prophet -- he didn't actually do it himself, rather he arbitrated a dispute
>> on who would be allowed to do it, *before his mission* -- there are those
>> who touch this stone, to touch a place where Muhammad may have touched.
>> That's a traditional practice, and could be considered a kind of worship,
>> but they would never do this as part of the prayer, it would be forbidden.
>>
>> We don't worship the stone. I do not recall *ever* thinking of the stone
>> while in prayer.
>>
>> So, again, Jojo is just tossing mud. He's actually claiming that many of
>> my friends, people I've known well, who are Christian and who even disagree
>> with me on theology, greatly, are actually *not Christians,* but only
>> because they don't agree with Jojo. That is, in fact, such an un-Christian
>> position that I'm going to assert:
>>
>> Jojo is not a TRUE Christian.
>>
>> And that's been totally obvious for a long time. Jojo is not following
>> Jesus, he's not imitating Jesus, he's not teaching what Jesus taught, he's
>> not demonstrating what Jesus demonstrated, he is, by pretending to be a
>> Christian, *defaming* the Christian religion. That he may be pretending
>> this even to himself would only demonstrate the depth of his denial.
>>
>> (As certain Muslims do with Islam through their own extremities.)
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
[email protected]

Reply via email to