OK, guys, what is #($*#$ is going on here? If Miley has what he claims to have -- a system that consistently produces power with no input power -- isn't it GAME OVER regarding Norman Ramsey's statement in the preamble of the DoE's cold fusion report that stated:
"Ordinarily, new scientific discoveries are claimed to be consistent and reproducible; as a result, if the experiments are not complicated, the discovery can usually be confirmed or disproved in a few months. The claims of cold fusion, however, are unusual in that even the strongest proponents of cold fusion assert that the experiments, for unknown reasons, are not consistent and reproducible at the present time. However, *even a single short but valid cold fusion period would be revolutionary*."- Dr. Norman Ramsey, Nobel laureate and professor of physics at Harvard University was the only person on the the 1989 Department of Energy cold fusion review panel to voice a dissenting opinion. Ramsey insisted on the inclusion of this preamble as an alternative to his resignation from the panel. Moreover, isn't it also GAME OVER regarding Gibbs's demand for a system that not only demonstrates the effect but has market potential? On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Moab Moab <moab2...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > It seems LENUCO might be up to get funding from ARPA-E. Maybe. First > he'll > > need enough votes. > > > > http://futureenergy.ultralightstartups.com/campaign/detail/861 > > Funding is not conditional upon getting enough votes. It does, > however, help. Selection is by ARPA-E committee. > >
