On Feb 8, 2013, at 4:42 PM, Rob Dingemans wrote:
Hi,
On 8-2-2013 22:38, Edmund Storms wrote:
Yes, by all means give George a chance to be heard. Nevertheless, I
think that all proposals need to be treated with the same level of
skepticism. Rossi, for example, is required to PROVE his claims,
which he has not done in many minds. I suggest George needs to do
the same before we in the field give him our support to get the
very small funds potentially available from the government. The
reviewers will examine the claims critically. If they discover that
the claims do not meet conventional standards but were nevertheless
advocated by many people in the field, this will not reflect well
on our objectivity.
I disagree, I think Andrea already did prove his claims. The problem
is only that almost nobody seems to understand what is going on.
So Rob, you think Andre has proven his claims in many minds. You say
that you believe him, but I do not get the impression that this is the
general opinion. In my case, I think he has shown that he can make
excess energy on occasion, but that does not seem to be a general
opinion.
In my opinion it all has to do with the vibration with the right
frequency of the Nickel granulate were the Hydrogen is flowing across.
Possibly the research of Frank Znidarsic can "enlighten" us.
Nobody was sofar able to look inside the vessel during operation (I
think neither Andrea was able to see this), but could it no be true
that a plasma is created due to the vibration?
And when this happens the hydrogen protons are most likely fused
with the Nickel resulting in Copper and a massive amount of energy
is released and therefore the process is also partially self-
sustaining.
This also explains why Andrea had no other option than to downsize
the first reactor vessels to the current modular smaller size, to
keep it controllable.
Otherwise you might get a reactor vessel that in the very long run
could end up with temperatures as high as inside the Sun!
And besides what about the equipment that Andrea had operational but
didn't focus on during the presentations that generated the obscure
frequencies?
The issue here is not what causes the reaction, but whether the claims
for a commercial product are justified. The Miley claim, which
started this discussion, is based on a commercial generator of heat.
The question was whether anyone should believe and support this claim.
In principle this is in my opinion the same mechanism that causes
hot fusion to take place.
This conclusion is not justified by what is observed. I suggest you
read my paper where this issue is discussed.
As the heat itself results in energy and a high frequency and
therefore keeps the process self-sustaining as long as sufficient
source-material is available.
It would probably be much better for the ITER project to focus on
the frequency of the plasma instead of the temperature.
How do you propose the frequency be measured? It's the temperature
that produces a useful result, so why ignore it?
Regards,
Ed
Kind regards,
Rob
Energy Ξ Communication
