I think we need to consider two types of skeptics. If a person does
not even believe the validity of the subject being discussed, what can
that skeptic contribute. If CF is not real, what is the point of
discussing why or how it works? The second kind of skeptics works by
considering the basic idea being true, but have questions about the
details. Cude is not interested in the details of CF because none of
the details are correct. I suggest this kind of skeptic is a waste of
time once the basic idea is accepted.
Ed Storms
On May 12, 2013, at 6:07 AM, Vorl Bek wrote:
On Sat, 11 May 2013 17:53:29 -0500
Joshua Cude <joshua.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not interested in an inaccessible (non-archived) list like
vortex-b, so
I'll just slink away. I may post a few responses to Rothwell's latest
replies over on wavewatching.net/fringe if they tolerate it.
Otherwise, adios. It's been a slice.
It is a pity that J Cude is leaving. While I enjoy a True Believer
site as much as anyone, after a while it is like eating nothing
but dessert - you need some meat and potatoes in the form of
articulate skeptics.
