I wrote:

> But anyone in his right mind who looks at all of the experimental evidence
> for LENR will be convinced.


I mean the totality of the evidence, as Mallove called it. People such as
Cude deny that there is such a thing as a totality of evidence. They do not
believe in the concept of supporting evidence. They say the tritium has
nothing to do with excess heat and neither of them has any connection to
the helium. They selectively deny one piece of evidence at a time, slicing
the problem into many bite-sized portions so they can raise imaginary
objections to one fact a time.

This is an unscientific approach.

- Jed

Reply via email to