So, Blaze.... on another thread you've reduced the odds down to 3:1. Does this mean that you aren't as confident betting against Rossi any more? Just spending some time on Vortex seems to have brought you from 10:1 skepticism down to 3:1. Eventually you'll go down to 2:1, then 1:1, and soon after that you'll be on the side betting FOR Rossi... ;-)
Re: [Vo]:Interview with Professor Bo Hoistad regarding eCat report - please respond here<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=subject:%22Re%3A+%5BVo%5D%3AInterview+with+Professor+Bo+Hoistad+regarding+eCat+report+-+please+respond+here%22> blaze spinnaker<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=from:%22blaze+spinnaker%22> Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:56:47 -0700<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=date:20130708> Ah, good to know. Its good to see a full-throated defense from the co-authors. Between this and the Pekka patent, very encouraging. I'd still give odds the ecat doesn't exist, though. Maybe 3 to 1 and I'd take 10 to 1 On Monday, July 8, 2013, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > This thread title had a character that is not part of the U.S. ASCII system: ö > > The thread will run amok with multiple appearances. Please respond to this message if you wish to comment on it. > - Jed > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Blaze. I'm very pleased to see you posting here on Vortex. You > may remember me on Intrade as ko, the guy who kept posting Cold Fusion > articles. And I won quite a bit of money when the contract I posted was > verified by Carl. > > So, yes. I'm very interested in such a bet. In particular I like the > 10:1 odds. But we need to find an unbiased 3rd party to hold the money > and make the decision. Who would that be, now that Intrade is defunct? > > Also, the parameters of the decision are different than I would settle > upon. I don't hold Gibbs all that high in esteem. > > Perhaps something like, the 7 scientists who verified the energy density > of the Ecat get their paper published in a peer reviewed publication? > > > > How I Made Money from Cold Fusion > Saturday, January 23, 2010 12:28:49 PM · by Kevmo · 28 replies · 1,013+ > views > Exclusive Article for Free Republic | 1/23/10 | Kevmo > http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2435697/posts > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:37 PM, blaze spinnaker <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> As a possible set of parameters to this bet: >> >> I'm willing to bet my 5000 against anyone's 500 that Mark Gibbs doesn't >> publish an article in Forbes this year that states he personally believes >> without a doubt that LENR+ is real and has a power density matching what >> Levi/Essen published (within some reasonable margin of error). >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:27 PM, blaze spinnaker < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Is anyone willing here to bet me $$$ that the eCat will not be proven >>> this year? >>> >>> I'm open to discussing the parameters of this bet. Ideally we'd >>> mutually agree on a 3rd party to hold our money and be an impartial judge >>> as to who wins by EOY. >>> >>> Let me know. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Blaze. >>> >> >> >
