This isn't ‘perpetual motion machine’. Its not breaking the law of conversation of energy. If it works, its getting energy from somewhere.
Sent from Windows Mail From: a.ashfield Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2013 1:31 PM To: [email protected] blazespinnaker Sat, 26 Oct 2013 12:01:02 -0700 "Why would it cause textbooks to be rewritten? Energy from gravity is already done via tidal energy. There’s nothing to see here unless it’s economical. We already have many forms of energy that generate power in ways that aren’t economical. Who cares if we have yet one more (and a seemingly terrible one at that)." Work from gravity is only known to work where potential energy in converted, like water from a dam. Tidal power uses the gravity of the orbiting moon. No one has ever managed to build a perpetual motion machine although many have tried for centuries. Conservation of energy is a very fundamental principle of physics although there is no proof of the theory it is just from observational data. The principle is used in many proofs and the whole scientific world would be turned upside down if the RAR gravity engine works.
