Robin, there is only one lower frequency where radiation is not possible and 
that is zero radians per second.  If you believe that some other frequency 
exists that is a threshold how would that be determined?  What in nature would 
separate one frequency from the next so that a well defined chasm is found?


Radiation can be generated at every frequency above zero radians per second 
but, as you suspect, it becomes difficult to develop an efficient radiating 
structure at near zero.  In the case of an atom, no radiation at all should be 
allowed, regardless of how inefficient the radiating structure unless it 
happens to be at one of the defined energy lines.  So, if Mills' model has a 
structure that allows the distant E and H fields to vary in time at any rate, 
then it would radiate at that frequency.  A non radiating structure can be 
shown to hold the far E and H fields constant at all frequencies.  The loop 
carrying DC that I often use as a model is an example of a structure that does 
not radiate, but that is only true when continuous smooth DC flows around the 
loop.


If for an experiment you collected the distributed charge from the perimeter of 
the DC loop and turned it into a single point charge in motion around the loop, 
radiation would be generated.   This is a result of the accelerated charge in 
motion around the perimeter of the loop.  When you spread the charge evenly 
however, each tiny incremental charge is accelerated and radiates into space.  
But, radiation is balanced out in all far field directions by the vector 
summation of all of the infinite incremental radiating segments.


Dave



-----Original Message-----
From: mixent <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu, Jan 23, 2014 4:20 pm
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:BLP's announcement


In reply to  David Roberson's message of Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:48:41 -0500 (EST):
Hi,
[snip]
>Jeff,
>
>I would be very surprised if the atom did not radiate energy under the 
conditions demonstrated in your second link.  A distant observer would see an E 
field that is changing direction back and forth at the rotation rate.  This is 
exactly the behavior expected from a short dipole radiator. 

Unless I'm mistaken, the reason for non-radiation is that there is a lower limit
to radiation as a phenomenon. It is the nature of the photon itself which
imposes the restriction. Photons have certain requirements, and if the moving
electron can't meet those requirements, then no photon can be constructed. The
result is "trapped" energy, which can't radiate, because the requirements can't
be met.

Mills uses the Haus condition to explain the trapping, while I use lack of
angular momentum to explain it.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html


 

Reply via email to