Watch the videos before commenting - they actually say that Rossi shouldn't be dismissed. They seemed very credible to me, like someone who had been working on the same problem and making slow progress over the years. Nanor is also LENR+ if you scale it up properly.
It also felt they were peer reviewing each other. I am awaiting the Nanor tech with great excitement. Hopefully MFMP gets a hold of it soon. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>wrote: > > Which has absolutely NOTHING to do with Rossi. Your entire assessment is > littered with irrelevant items. > > > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Increasing the probability to 47% on the basis on Nanor / MIT videos. >> >> >> >>
