On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 5:23 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Axil, unless Simakin et al share your theory, it is not the experiment I > am after. > Simakin does understand that nanoplasmonics can cause nuclear reactions. > Even if they do share your theory, you are predicting particular nuclear > products that must be discriminated from those that would arise from other > processes and I see no indication that they performed the required > measurements. > One of the characteristics of photo nuclear reactions is that this reaction type usually occurs in even(protons) even(protons) elements. Also photofusion should not produce radioactive isotopes. > > Furthermore, you are making bold claims about what we call LENR or "cold > fusion" processes that are apparently producing large amounts of excess > heat in commercial devices. > There is an important strength component of the EMF LENR causation. > While Simakin's device may have some aspects that bear some resemblance to > those devices, it is clearly not what most people would call "cold fusion" > or "LENR" and it is clearly not producing anything like excess energy. > Excess energy is a quantity consideration, not a quality consideration. The Ni/H reactor produces lots of excess heat because it has lots of reactions going on per second. A pinch of uranium may be fissioning and not produce measurable heat, but a A-bomb produces lots of fission per nanosecond and it produces lots of excess heat. It is a matter of quantity with the quality being equal.
