The device will look a lot like the recent NI/H reactors. The vender of the Ni/H reactor who takes polariton production of magnetic solutions most to heart will dominate the marketplace.
The reaction products of both the DGT reaction and the Rossi reaction match my latest predictions---heavy low Z element production. I am sure that will not be Mills. By the way, I change my mind on occasion when conditions warrant...this is a good thing. On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 7:10 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > My point is measurement is central to experiment. If you aren't measuring > phenomena you seek to explain with similar signal to noise ratios, you need > a different experiment. > > Look, its simple: If you have the keys to the LENR/Cold Fusio kingdom > then you should be able to design a device that outperforms, in terms of > excess energy, any of those that don't have those keys. Moreover, the > reaction products should match your theory. > > What does this device look like? > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 5:23 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Axil, unless Simakin et al share your theory, it is not the experiment I >>> am after. >>> >> >> Simakin does understand that nanoplasmonics can cause nuclear reactions. >> >> >>> Even if they do share your theory, you are predicting particular nuclear >>> products that must be discriminated from those that would arise from other >>> processes and I see no indication that they performed the required >>> measurements. >>> >> >> One of the characteristics of photo nuclear reactions is that this >> reaction type usually occurs in even(protons) even(protons) elements. >> >> Also photofusion should not produce radioactive isotopes. >> >> >>> >>> Furthermore, you are making bold claims about what we call LENR or "cold >>> fusion" processes that are apparently producing large amounts of excess >>> heat in commercial devices. >>> >> >> There is an important strength component of the EMF LENR causation. >> >> >>> While Simakin's device may have some aspects that bear some resemblance >>> to those devices, it is clearly not what most people would call "cold >>> fusion" or "LENR" and it is clearly not producing anything like excess >>> energy. >>> >> >> Excess energy is a quantity consideration, not a quality consideration. >> The Ni/H reactor produces lots of excess heat because it has lots of >> reactions going on per second. >> >> A pinch of uranium may be fissioning and not produce measurable heat, but >> a A-bomb produces lots of fission per nanosecond and it produces lots of >> excess heat. It is a matter of quantity with the quality being equal. >> >> >
