If you are interested in black hole research, I have just read how to do it with polaritons. You can produce worm holes, white holes, and black holes, even alternate universes,
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1104.3013v2.pdf Black Holes and Wormholes in spinor polariton condensates On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 9:13 AM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > I almost took that as an honorable mention... > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:29 AM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Axil, you speak with the authority of one who knows -- perhaps even more >> so than ChemE. >> >> Does your authoritative knowledge shed light on an economical >> demonstration of that knowledge? >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 11:24 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Radioisotopes are not produced in LENR when the nucleus is suppressed >>> (coulomb barrio screened) by magnetic fields, because these photons do not >>> excite the nuclus like neutrons do. They carry no angular momentum or >>> kinetic energy to excite the nucleus. >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>> These discussions about "suppressing" gamma rays and neutrons have been >>>>> around since the beginning of cold fusion. >>>>> >>>> >>>> It is true that some people in this thread have been arguing about the >>>> suppression of MeV-range gammas. Like you say, this sounds pretty far-out. >>>> Better not to have powerful gammas in the first place. What is more >>>> interesting in the recent discussion is whether p+Ni fusion is ruled out by >>>> the evidence, and that has been what has absorbed a lot of our attention. >>>> If low-level penetrating radiation is not allowed (e.g., photons in the >>>> keV range, some of which might be considered "gammas"), then p+Ni is >>>> contraindicated, because everything we know about p+Ni says that it will >>>> result in short-lived radioisotopes and associated emissions after it takes >>>> place, for a period of hours or days. If low-level radiation is allowed, >>>> then p+Ni is not necessarily ruled out. That is the heart of much of the >>>> recent thread. >>>> >>>> Jones wants to say that there is no penetrating radiation whatsoever in >>>> NiH. He no doubt has his reversible proton fusion in mind. Ed wants to >>>> say that what low-level radiation there is above a very low threshold is >>>> due to side channels (if I have understood him). He has his hydroton in >>>> mind. I've argued that the evidence bears otherwise on both counts, and >>>> that low-level penetrating radiation is both seen and is perhaps inherent >>>> to NiH cold fusion and not due to a side channel. Although this discussion >>>> might look like the usual discussion about MeV gammas, really it has been a >>>> discussion about short-lived radioisotopes that follow upon whatever it is >>>> that cold fusion consists of. So we've been having a discussion that is >>>> different than the usual "gamma" discussion. Rossi's terminology confuses >>>> things, because he appears to refer to all photons in his system as gammas. >>>> >>>> Eric >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
