What is gained by lying and then using a description that has no relationship to reality? LENR is a nuclear process. It might or it might not have any relationship to plasmonic reactions. The people who make decisions about what to fund are not children and they are not part of the unwashed masses. Playing games with words will not work. It just makes us look dishonest and confused.
Ed Storms On Mar 13, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Axil Axil wrote: > One of the tragic miscalculations made by spokespersons who attempt to > explain ‘COLD FUSION’ is the subconscious connection that they make between > current fusion/fission nuclear based technology and cold fusion. In fact > there is no connection. > > This unfortunate connection between cold fusion and the nuclear industry was > mistakenly made very early on and has become a tradition in the cold fusion > community. > > When addressing an audience with no background in cold fusion, it might be > best to decuple this technology conceptually from conventional nuclear energy. > > With this wisdom in mind, Defkalion has again changed the name of their > reaction from > > Heat Energy from Nuclei Interactions > To > > Heat Energy from Nanoplasmonics/Nanoexplosions Interactions > > The name of our technology should have no links to existing scientific meme > to confuse the great unwashed masses being exposed to it for the first time. > > This inaccurate meme connection through the words we use is unnecessarily > counterproductive from a propaganda and product positioning standpoint. > > Our collective interests might be better served if we conform to the naming > conventions that DGT is using whatever it is currently is since Rossi lives > in his own anti social world. > > Low energy Nanoplasmonic reaction LENR might be good to use also. > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Frank Znidarsic suggested I enter this essay contest: > > "How Should Humanity Steer the Future?" > > http://fqxi.org/community/essay > > Unfortunately, the contest judges are the editors of the Scientific American. > I decided I might as well let them know we are still here, so I submitted an > essay pointing out their ignorance. Here it is: > > http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2000 > > - Jed > >
