Yes, winning a prize will not happen, but the writeup is public and can be inspected by all and sundry. You can never tell what strange processes that the writeup will activate in the mind of an influential party.
Such a writeup should be improved over time and used a raw material or "boilerplate" for other public discourse opportunities. The document should be made as fine as possible so that its future use be it either in full or in part be it by you or someone else should be made as effective as possible to advance the prospects for LENR now and into the future. The comments and criticism that we impose on each other here at vortex most often lead us to a better place and prepare us for the future coming public discourse. Here in these most friendly confines, its the ideas that are ravaged not the originators of those ideas. We all hold the upmost respect and admiration for this period of protected "spring training" to prepare us for the "regular season" that is so very close at hand. We all swing and miss or get blasted over the center field wall. But it is all done within the warm and friendly confines of the same team. On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would advise changing the wording of this section . . . >> > > Actually, I do not think I can change it. There is no procedure for that. > > This is not going to win any prizes so it is not important. The judges > from Scientific American will glance at the title and dismiss it. I expect > they will never even read the part where I take them to task. > > - Jed > >
