I would advise changing the wording of this section From:
"Cold fusion would enhance energy intensive, automated, advanced recycling techniques. One such technique is to mix waste materials with molten steel in a sealed container. Most of the waste is converted into useful raw material. None of it escapes into the environment. This has been developed but it is uneconomical, partly because of the high cost of energy. It could be used to safely recycle toxic chemical waste from "superfund"sites. Eventually, it could eliminate most landfills." To: LENR can eliminate mixed waste materials through the process of both molecular and atomic rearmament. Value added raw materials like rare earths and precious metals can be transmuted from common waste streams. Note: The word count was cut in half. On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Cold fusion does not produce carbon dioxide or any other chemical >> product, so it would >> eliminate the source of global warming. >> >> Should read >> >> Cold fusion does not produce carbon dioxide . . . >> > The essay is limited to 9 pages plus 2 pages of references. I could not > say much. > > In an essay of this nature, it is a good idea to boil things down and keep > the number of pages low. People will not read it otherwise. It is good to > be succinct. > > - Jed > >
