Axil, how do you know how I produce the NAE. I do not know this and neither of us knows how Rossi does this. Your guesses are not useful.
I can comprehend the process you describe. I just do not believe it. Do you see the difference? Ed Storms On Mar 22, 2014, at 3:23 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > There is more than one way to skin a cat. LENR active cracks can be produced > in more than one way. The way Rossi produces NAE is different than the way Ed > Storms produces NAE, and Rossi is far more productive and robust at it. > > Rossi produces NAE with his “mouse” which is a nano-particle generator. > Nano-particles are attracted to each other and form fractal arrogates. These > arrogates are like dust bunnies that you find under the bed. They enclose > countless nano-cavities that serve as NAE. > > Here is pictures of such a fractal abrogate: > > http://ej.iop.org/images/1367-2630/11/6/063030/Full/nj311113fig1.jpg > > Note the presence of numerous nano-cavities that develops naturally through > electrostatic processes. > > When these dust bunnies drift onto the 5 micron micro particles, the micro > particles use dipole vibration to feed power into these NAE inside the dust > bunnies. > > I deeply regret that Ed Storms cannot comprehend this simple process. It > would be better for LENR if he did. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > Bob, temperature is not the source of cracks or have any role in their > function. Temperature changes the rate at which hydrogen is delivered to the > crack. It is important to understand the role of each variable. You can find > an explanation at http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEexplaining.pdf. > > Ed Storms > > On Mar 22, 2014, at 1:04 PM, Bob Cook wrote: > >> Ed-- >> >> Engineering resonances associated with any given crack characteristic >> associated with LENR activation may help expand the useful crack >> population. Rossi seems to use temperature as a control. >> >> Bob >> From: Edmund Storms >> Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2014 10:46 AM >> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >> Cc: Edmund Storms >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:2 Modes of the FPE >> >> Yes, getting a wide variety of sizes is easy. Getting enough of the right >> size in this distribution is the problem. Only a few of the right size will >> not give enough energy to be detected. When radiation or tritium is used to >> detect the occurrence of LENR, the effect can be seen using fewer active >> sites. However, these methods hav e not been used very often, probably >> because the tools and skill are not common. >> >> Cracks either want to grow larger or sinter and disappear. As a result, >> production of LENR is unstable. This makes the effect occur for brief >> times, but not long enough to be sure LENR is actually happening rather than >> a random event. >> >> Ed Stormss >> On Mar 22, 2014, at 11:28 AM, James Bowery wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Based on my theory, the active material are nano-cracks. Making these at >>> the require size is the challenge. Cracks can be made many different ways, >>> but getting the right size is the problem. >>> >>> Might there be a technique that generates a wide distribution of crack >>> sizes? >>> >> >> > >
