More... The Rossi reaction is a two step operation where the "mouse" produces NAEs and the "Cat" consumes these NAEs that are mobile one currents of hydrogen.
How else can it work??? On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, a guess but a good guess. Rossi's mouse is stimulating the "Cat" with > something that floats on a hydrogen gas current and whose production is > controlled through the application of heat. > > Rossi solved his control problem by separating dust bunnies production in > one unit that has a very low Q and is not subject to run away > reaction; independent of a very reactive high Q unit (the Cat) that is > essentially supercritical. The Cat just consumes these dust particles > vigorously, but this stage cannot produce dust bunnies to cause a positive > feedback runaway reaction through a direct thermal connection. > > It is so obvious and so simple. > > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > >> Axil, how do you know how I produce the NAE. I do not know this and >> neither of us knows how Rossi does this. Your guesses are not useful. >> >> I can comprehend the process you describe. I just do not believe it. Do >> you see the difference? >> >> Ed Storms >> >> On Mar 22, 2014, at 3:23 PM, Axil Axil wrote: >> >> There is more than one way to skin a cat. LENR active cracks can be >> produced in more than one way. The way Rossi produces NAE is different than >> the way Ed Storms produces NAE, and Rossi is far more productive and robust >> at it. >> >> >> Rossi produces NAE with his "mouse" which is a nano-particle generator. >> Nano-particles are attracted to each other and form fractal arrogates. >> These arrogates are like dust bunnies that you find under the bed. They >> enclose countless nano-cavities that serve as NAE. >> >> >> Here is pictures of such a fractal abrogate: >> >> >> http://ej.iop.org/images/1367-2630/11/6/063030/Full/nj311113fig1.jpg >> >> >> Note the presence of numerous nano-cavities that develops naturally >> through electrostatic processes. >> >> >> When these dust bunnies drift onto the 5 micron micro particles, the >> micro particles use dipole vibration to feed power into these NAE inside >> the dust bunnies. >> >> >> I deeply regret that Ed Storms cannot comprehend this simple process. It >> would be better for LENR if he did. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: >> >>> Bob, temperature is not the source of cracks or have any role in their >>> function. Temperature changes the rate at which hydrogen is delivered to >>> the crack. It is important to understand the role of each variable. You can >>> find an explanation at >>> http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEexplaining.pdf. >>> >>> Ed Storms >>> >>> On Mar 22, 2014, at 1:04 PM, Bob Cook wrote: >>> >>> Ed-- >>> >>> Engineering resonances associated with any given crack characteristic >>> associated with LENR activation may help expand the useful crack >>> population. Rossi seems to use temperature as a control. >>> >>> Bob >>> *From:* Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> >>> *Sent:* Saturday, March 22, 2014 10:46 AM >>> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >>> *Cc:* Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> >>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:2 Modes of the FPE >>> >>> Yes, getting a wide variety of sizes is easy. Getting enough of the >>> right size in this distribution is the problem. Only a few of the right >>> size will not give enough energy to be detected. When radiation or tritium >>> is used to detect the occurrence of LENR, the effect can be seen using >>> fewer active sites. However, these methods hav e not been used very often, >>> probably because the tools and skill are not common. >>> >>> Cracks either want to grow larger or sinter and disappear. As a result, >>> production of LENR is unstable. This makes the effect occur for brief >>> times, but not long enough to be sure LENR is actually happening rather >>> than a random event. >>> >>> Ed Stormss >>> On Mar 22, 2014, at 11:28 AM, James Bowery wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Edmund Storms >>> <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Based on my theory, the active material are nano-cracks. Making >>>> these at the require size is the challenge. Cracks can be made many >>>> different ways, but getting the right size is the problem. >>>> >>>> Might there be a technique that generates a wide distribution of crack >>> sizes? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
