beyond cracks , maybe is there some topological defect, longitudinal defects, crystallographic-phase change planes...
is there document about hydroton. naively among possibilities I imagine a circular hydroton ring and thing about a superconductor.. to explain magnetic fields. maybe stupid... 2014-03-22 22:12 GMT+01:00 Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com>: > Dear Ed, > > The most dangerous aspect of the addiction of CF to cracks is that caracks > are destroying the active material, so technologically speaking the crack > theory is a death sentence. It can be true for palladium, but less noble > transition metals are working hopefully in a different way. PdD and NiH are > probably quite different species. > Peter > > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > >> If I had such a method, I would first write a patent. Unfortunately, that >> is the method we are trying to find. I can make cracks anytime I want but >> I can not make the most effective distribution at will, although I get >> lucky sometimes. >> >> Ed Storms >> >> On Mar 22, 2014, at 1:58 PM, James Bowery wrote: >> >> I may have inadequately expressed what I was looking for: >> >> A technique to generate, in a single sample, a wide and relatively flat >> (very low kurtosis) distribution of crack sizes (and a large number of such >> cracks of course). >> >> This, as opposed to a wide array of techniques, each of which generates >> different but relatively narrow distribution of crack sizes. >> >> Obviously if you have a sensitive detection technique, like tritium with >> scintillation, you would prefer applying a single technique to a single >> sample and getting detectable tritium -- however small. >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: >> >>> I know of no single paper that describes how cracks are formed. However, >>> a huge literature exists that describe how cracks are produced in materials >>> and how this destructive process can be avoided. I have 69 papers in my >>> collection that address this issue. Unless you are prepared to do a lot of >>> study, an answer to your question is not easy to supply. >>> >>> Ed Storms >>> >>> On Mar 22, 2014, at 1:39 PM, James Bowery wrote: >>> >>> Is there a paper describing the technique(s) for generating a wide >>> distribution of crack sizes? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Tritium can not be detected easily using a beta detector. The best way >>>> is to convert the gas to water and measure the tritium using the >>>> scintillation metaod. The allows the sample to be studied over a period of >>>> time by many people if they wish. >>>> >>>> Ed Storms >>>> >>>> On Mar 22, 2014, at 1:02 PM, James Bowery wrote: >>>> >>>> Perhaps I can illustrate by avoiding thermal detection and going with >>>> tritium: >>>> >>>> Since tritium production is inherently time integrated, setting up a >>>> Cravens style dual experiment with a one treated to have a wide range of >>>> crack sizes, and both identical in all other respects, puts the primary >>>> cost constraint on the beta-emission counter. Can such counters be made >>>> economical? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 1:56 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ed, I'm attacking a different problem: Cost. >>>>> >>>>> Since we're in a quasi-Edisonian phase of scientific research, keeping >>>>> the cost per experiment as low as possible seems to be the bottleneck to >>>>> getting a protocol that has reproduces the FPE to any statistically >>>>> significant degree. >>>>> >>>>> Developing a different kind of experimental set up may be the key. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Edmund Storms >>>>> <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> James, I feel much more comfortable using a calorimeter design I can >>>>>> trust and that has been used in the past. The Cravens device is a nice >>>>>> demonstration but it proves nothing. I have made calorimeters that do the >>>>>> job much better and give absolute values for power. No need exists to >>>>>> reinvent. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ed Storms >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 22, 2014, at 12:27 PM, James Bowery wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> If you are running a Cravens style simultaneous, colocated control >>>>>> experiment with infinite COP your odds of detecting a tiny temperature >>>>>> difference economically are vastly improved. Basically you just >>>>>> integrate >>>>>> the voltage out of a bimetallic (thermocoupling) wall separating the >>>>>> treated material from the untreated material in a common vessel that >>>>>> provides a small amount of gas communication between the chambers for >>>>>> pressure equalization. This is not an expensive device. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Edmund Storms < >>>>>> stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, getting a wide variety of sizes is easy. Getting enough of the >>>>>>> right size in this distribution is the problem. Only a few of the right >>>>>>> size will not give enough energy to be detected. When radiation or >>>>>>> tritium >>>>>>> is used to detect the occurrence of LENR, the effect can be seen using >>>>>>> fewer active sites. However, these methods have not been used very >>>>>>> often, >>>>>>> probably because the tools and skill are not common. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cracks either want to grow larger or sinter and disappear. As a >>>>>>> result, production of LENR is unstable. This makes the effect occur for >>>>>>> brief times, but not long enough to be sure LENR is actually happening >>>>>>> rather than a random event. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ed Storms >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mar 22, 2014, at 11:28 AM, James Bowery wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Edmund Storms < >>>>>>> stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Based on my theory, the active material are nano-cracks. Making >>>>>>>> these at the require size is the challenge. Cracks can be made many >>>>>>>> different ways, but getting the right size is the problem. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Might there be a technique that generates a wide distribution of >>>>>>> crack sizes? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >
